On 6/8/23 16:48, Simon Horman wrote:
> On Mon, Jun 05, 2023 at 03:39:02PM +0200, Eelco Chaudron wrote:
>> Make the read of the current seq->value atomic, i.e., not needing to
>> acquire the global mutex when reading it. On 64-bit systems, this
>> incurs no overhead, and it will avoid the mutex and
On Mon, Jun 05, 2023 at 03:39:02PM +0200, Eelco Chaudron wrote:
> Make the read of the current seq->value atomic, i.e., not needing to
> acquire the global mutex when reading it. On 64-bit systems, this
> incurs no overhead, and it will avoid the mutex and potentially
> a system call.
>
> For incr
Make the read of the current seq->value atomic, i.e., not needing to
acquire the global mutex when reading it. On 64-bit systems, this
incurs no overhead, and it will avoid the mutex and potentially
a system call.
For incrementing the value followed by waking up the threads, we are
still taking th
