On 01/12/2023 14:29, David Marchand wrote:
Because a DPDK backed netdev configuration is done in an asynchronous way,
and a MTU change requires a reconfiguration, directly checking
ovs-vswitchd logs or querying ovsdb for the interface current MTU value
is racy.
Add synchronisation points on the
On 1 Dec 2023, at 15:29, David Marchand wrote:
> Because a DPDK backed netdev configuration is done in an asynchronous way,
> and a MTU change requires a reconfiguration, directly checking
> ovs-vswitchd logs or querying ovsdb for the interface current MTU value
> is racy.
>
> Add synchronisati
On 01/12/2023 14:29, David Marchand wrote:
Because a DPDK backed netdev configuration is done in an asynchronous way,
and a MTU change requires a reconfiguration, directly checking
ovs-vswitchd logs or querying ovsdb for the interface current MTU value
is racy.
Add synchronisation points on the
Because a DPDK backed netdev configuration is done in an asynchronous way,
and a MTU change requires a reconfiguration, directly checking
ovs-vswitchd logs or querying ovsdb for the interface current MTU value
is racy.
Add synchronisation points on the interface MTU value in ovsdb as it
ensures th
