On 9/7/17, 6:59 PM, "Yuanhan Liu" wrote:
On Thu, Sep 07, 2017 at 06:52:49PM +, Patil, Harish wrote:
> >Hi all,
> >
> >Can you please confirm that you are supporting offloading of both the EMC
> >flows and DPCLs (megaflows) here, i.e. OVS would skip hash table lookups
-Original Message-
From: Yuanhan Liu
Date: Thursday, September 7, 2017 at 6:58 PM
To: Harish Patil
Cc: Finn Christensen , "d...@openvswitch.org"
, "db...@vmware.com"
Subject: Re: [ovs-dev] [PATCH v2 0/8] OVS-DPDK flow offload with rte_flow
>On Thu, Sep 07, 2
Regards
_Sugesh
> -Original Message-
> From: Yuanhan Liu [mailto:y...@fridaylinux.org]
> Sent: Monday, September 11, 2017 11:23 AM
> To: Chandran, Sugesh
> Cc: d...@openvswitch.org
> Subject: Re: [ovs-dev] [PATCH v2 0/8] OVS-DPDK flow offload with rte_flow
>
>
On Mon, Sep 11, 2017 at 10:00:06AM +, Chandran, Sugesh wrote:
> > > In our implementation we have a feature discovery at the OVS init. It will
> > also populate the OVSDB to expose the device capability to higher
> > management layers. The new table introduced in OVSDB is like below.
> >
> > T
Regards
_Sugesh
> -Original Message-
> From: Yuanhan Liu [mailto:y...@fridaylinux.org]
> Sent: Monday, September 11, 2017 10:12 AM
> To: Chandran, Sugesh
> Cc: d...@openvswitch.org
> Subject: Re: [ovs-dev] [PATCH v2 0/8] OVS-DPDK flow offload with rte_flow
>
>
On Sun, Sep 10, 2017 at 04:12:47PM +, Chandran, Sugesh wrote:
> Hi Yuanhan,
>
> Thank you for sending out the patch series.
Hi Sugesh,
Thank you for taking your time to review it!
> We are also looking into something similar to enable full offload in OVS-DPDK.
Good to know!
> It is base
I see. Thanks!
--yliu
On Fri, Sep 08, 2017 at 07:29:48PM +, Darrell Ball wrote:
> Hi Yuanhan
>
> In the dpdk public meeting, we requested Simon to also review this series to
> check
> that it is sync with the HWOL for kernel with respect to one or two high
> level aspects.
> I had
f Yuanhan Liu
> Sent: Tuesday, September 5, 2017 10:23 AM
> To: d...@openvswitch.org
> Subject: [ovs-dev] [PATCH v2 0/8] OVS-DPDK flow offload with rte_flow
>
> Hi,
>
> Here is a joint work from Mellanox and Napatech, to enable the flow hw
> offload with the DPDK generic
Hi Yuanhan
In the dpdk public meeting, we requested Simon to also review this series to
check
that it is sync with the HWOL for kernel with respect to one or two high level
aspects.
I had some comments related to coding standards for V2, but I’ll wait for you
to respond
to Simon’s comments befo
On Thu, Sep 07, 2017 at 06:52:49PM +, Patil, Harish wrote:
> >Hi all,
> >
> >Can you please confirm that you are supporting offloading of both the EMC
> >flows and DPCLs (megaflows) here, i.e. OVS would skip hash table lookups
> >in both the cases if UFID is provided in the MBUF. Assuming that
-Original Message-
From: Finn Christensen
Date: Tuesday, September 5, 2017 at 11:53 PM
To: Harish Patil , Yuanhan Liu
, "d...@openvswitch.org"
Cc: "db...@vmware.com"
Subject: RE: [ovs-dev] [PATCH v2 0/8] OVS-DPDK flow offload with rte_flow
>
>-Original
-Original Message-
From: Patil, Harish [mailto:harish.pa...@cavium.com]
Sent: 6. september 2017 08:34
To: Yuanhan Liu ; d...@openvswitch.org
Cc: Finn Christensen ; db...@vmware.com
Subject: Re: [ovs-dev] [PATCH v2 0/8] OVS-DPDK flow offload with rte_flow
-Original Message
-Original Message-
From: on behalf of Yuanhan Liu
Date: Tuesday, September 5, 2017 at 2:22 AM
To: "d...@openvswitch.org"
Subject: [ovs-dev] [PATCH v2 0/8] OVS-DPDK flow offload with rte_flow
>Hi,
>
>Here is a joint work from Mellanox and Napatech, to enable the fl
Hi,
Here is a joint work from Mellanox and Napatech, to enable the flow hw
offload with the DPDK generic flow interface (rte_flow).
The basic idea is to associate the flow with a mark id (a unit32_t number).
Later, we then get the flow directly from the mark id, bypassing the heavy
emc processing
14 matches
Mail list logo
