> How about this approach, which should cleanly eliminate the warning?
>
> diff --git a/ofproto/ofproto-dpif.c b/ofproto/ofproto-dpif.c
> index e1a5c097f3aa..362339a4abb4 100644
> --- a/ofproto/ofproto-dpif.c
> +++ b/ofproto/ofproto-dpif.c
> @@ -4780,22 +4780,17 @@
On Tue, Apr 17, 2018 at 01:03:17PM -0700, Ben Pfaff wrote:
> On Mon, Apr 16, 2018 at 04:26:27PM +0200, Jan Scheurich wrote:
> > The current implementation of the "dp_hash" selection method suffers
> > from two deficiences: 1. The hash mask and hence the number of dp_hash
> > values is just large
On Mon, Apr 16, 2018 at 04:26:27PM +0200, Jan Scheurich wrote:
> The current implementation of the "dp_hash" selection method suffers
> from two deficiences: 1. The hash mask and hence the number of dp_hash
> values is just large enough to cover the number of group buckets, but
> does not consider
Hi Ychen,
Thank you for finding yet another corner case. I will fix it in the next
version with the following incremental:
diff --git a/ofproto/ofproto-dpif.c b/ofproto/ofproto-dpif.c
index 8f71083..674b3b5 100644
--- a/ofproto/ofproto-dpif.c
+++ b/ofproto/ofproto-dpif.c
@@ -4762,6 +4762,11 @@
Hi, Jan:
I think the following code should also be modified
+ for (int hash = 0; hash < n_hash; hash++) {
+ double max_val = 0.0;
+ struct webster *winner;
+for (i = 0; i < n_buckets; i++) {
+if (webster[i].value > max_val) { ===> if
bucket->weight=0,
The current implementation of the "dp_hash" selection method suffers
from two deficiences: 1. The hash mask and hence the number of dp_hash
values is just large enough to cover the number of group buckets, but
does not consider the case that buckets have different weights. 2. The
xlate-time
