On 07/05/2017 10:16 PM, Aaron Conole wrote:
> Hi Markos,
> [...]
>>
>> I am a bit puzzled about this to be honest... I am wondering if it would
>> be better to do it the other way around. For example, supply a sysconfig
>> file with OVS_USER_ID commented out, but if it's an upgrade, then do the
>>
Hi Markos,
Markos Chandras writes:
> Hi Aaron,
>
> On 07/05/2017 08:56 PM, Aaron Conole wrote:
>> After this commit, the fedora RPM will create the openvswitch user, from the
>> non-static pool, for use as an Open vSwitch daemon user. This only happens
>> on install - not upgrade. This will be
Hi Aaron,
On 07/05/2017 08:56 PM, Aaron Conole wrote:
> After this commit, the fedora RPM will create the openvswitch user, from the
> non-static pool, for use as an Open vSwitch daemon user. This only happens
> on install - not upgrade. This will be the default user:group
> combination for the
After this commit, the fedora RPM will create the openvswitch user, from the
non-static pool, for use as an Open vSwitch daemon user. This only happens
on install - not upgrade. This will be the default user:group
combination for the openvswitch daemons.
Signed-off-by: Aaron Conole
---
rhel/op