From: Numan Siddique
After the patch [1], which added caching of lflow expr, the lflow_resource_ref
is not rebuilt properly when lflow_run() is called. If a lflow is already cached
in lflow expr cache, then the lflow_resource_ref is not updated.
But flow_output_run() clears the lflow_resource_ref
Hi, Numan. Would it be possible to add a test case that exercises the fix?
On 2/18/20 2:53 PM, num...@ovn.org wrote:
From: Numan Siddique
After the patch [1], which added caching of lflow expr, the lflow_resource_ref
is not rebuilt properly when lflow_run() is called. If a lflow is already cac
On Wed, Feb 19, 2020, 3:01 AM Mark Michelson wrote:
> Hi, Numan. Would it be possible to add a test case that exercises the fix?
>
Hi Mark,
The modified test case in this patch fails without the fix.
Numan
> On 2/18/20 2:53 PM, num...@ovn.org wrote:
> > From: Numan Siddique
> >
> > After th
On Tue, Feb 18, 2020 at 11:54 AM wrote:
>
> From: Numan Siddique
>
> After the patch [1], which added caching of lflow expr, the
lflow_resource_ref
> is not rebuilt properly when lflow_run() is called. If a lflow is already
cached
> in lflow expr cache, then the lflow_resource_ref is not updated.
On Wed, Feb 19, 2020 at 1:10 PM Han Zhou wrote:
>
> On Tue, Feb 18, 2020 at 11:54 AM wrote:
> >
> > From: Numan Siddique
> >
> > After the patch [1], which added caching of lflow expr, the
> lflow_resource_ref
> > is not rebuilt properly when lflow_run() is called. If a lflow is already
> cached