On Fri, Jul 16, 2021 at 7:30 PM Stokes, Ian wrote:
>
> > On 16/07/2021 17:21, David Marchand wrote:
> > > Users complained that per rxq pmd usage was confusing: summing those
> > > values per pmd would never reach 100% even if increasing traffic load
> > > beyond pmd capacity.
> > >
> > > This is
> On 16/07/2021 17:21, David Marchand wrote:
> > Users complained that per rxq pmd usage was confusing: summing those
> > values per pmd would never reach 100% even if increasing traffic load
> > beyond pmd capacity.
> >
> > This is because the dpif-netdev/pmd-rxq-show command only reports "pure"
On 16/07/2021 17:21, David Marchand wrote:
> Users complained that per rxq pmd usage was confusing: summing those
> values per pmd would never reach 100% even if increasing traffic load
> beyond pmd capacity.
>
> This is because the dpif-netdev/pmd-rxq-show command only reports "pure"
> rxq
Users complained that per rxq pmd usage was confusing: summing those
values per pmd would never reach 100% even if increasing traffic load
beyond pmd capacity.
This is because the dpif-netdev/pmd-rxq-show command only reports "pure"
rxq cycles while some cycles are used in the pmd mainloop and
