On Wed, Jan 24, 2018 at 10:10:16AM -0200, Flavio Leitner wrote:
> On Tue, Jan 23, 2018 at 12:31:53PM -0800, Ben Pfaff wrote:
> > On Wed, Jan 17, 2018 at 10:09:58PM -0200, Flavio Leitner wrote:
> > > Today OVS pushes packets to the TAP interface ignoring its
> > > current state. That works because t
On Tue, Jan 23, 2018 at 12:31:53PM -0800, Ben Pfaff wrote:
> On Wed, Jan 17, 2018 at 10:09:58PM -0200, Flavio Leitner wrote:
> > Today OVS pushes packets to the TAP interface ignoring its
> > current state. That works because the kernel will return -EIO
> > when it's not UP and OVS will just ignore
On Wed, Jan 17, 2018 at 10:09:58PM -0200, Flavio Leitner wrote:
> Today OVS pushes packets to the TAP interface ignoring its
> current state. That works because the kernel will return -EIO
> when it's not UP and OVS will just ignore that as it is not
> an OVS issue.
>
> However, it causes a huge i
Today OVS pushes packets to the TAP interface ignoring its
current state. That works because the kernel will return -EIO
when it's not UP and OVS will just ignore that as it is not
an OVS issue.
However, it causes a huge impact when broadcasts happen when
using userspace datapath accelerated with
