org
> Subject: Re: [ovs-dev] [PATCH v6] dpif-netdev: Assign ports to pmds on non-
> local numa node.
>
> For the last sentence:
>
> I think
> “In the case such, a queue assignment is made”
> was meant to be
> “In case such a queue assignment is made”
>
>
> From: Darrell Ball [mailto:db...@vmware.com]
> Sent: Monday, June 26, 2017 4:53 PM
> To: O Mahony, Billy ; d...@openvswitch.org
> Subject: Re: [ovs-dev] [PATCH v6] dpif-netdev: Assign ports to pmds on
non-
> local numa node.
>
>
>
>
ware.com]
>
> > Sent: Monday, June 26, 2017 8:04 AM
>
> > To: O Mahony, Billy ; d...@openvswitch.org
>
> > Subject: Re: [ovs-dev] [PATCH v6] dpif-netdev: Assign ports to pmds on
> non-
>
> > local numa node.
>
> >
>
>
o: O Mahony, Billy ; d...@openvswitch.org
> Subject: Re: [ovs-dev] [PATCH v6] dpif-netdev: Assign ports to pmds on
non-
> local numa node.
>
> I think this is helpful in some cases where lower performance is an
> acceptable tradeoff with more
/Billy.
>
>> -Original Message-
>> From: Ilya Maximets [mailto:i.maxim...@samsung.com]
>> Sent: Monday, June 26, 2017 2:49 PM
>> To: O Mahony, Billy ; d...@openvswitch.org
>> Cc: Stokes, Ian ; 'Jan Scheurich'
>> ; Darrell Ball
>> Subject:
ne 26, 2017 2:49 PM
> To: O Mahony, Billy ; d...@openvswitch.org
> Cc: Stokes, Ian ; 'Jan Scheurich'
> ; Darrell Ball
> Subject: Re: [ovs-dev] [PATCH v6] dpif-netdev: Assign ports to pmds on non-
> local numa node.
>
> I don't like the implementation. The bu
Hi Darrell,
Thanks for reviewing.
> -Original Message-
> From: Darrell Ball [mailto:db...@vmware.com]
> Sent: Monday, June 26, 2017 8:04 AM
> To: O Mahony, Billy ; d...@openvswitch.org
> Subject: Re: [ovs-dev] [PATCH v6] dpif-netdev: Assign ports to pmds on non-
> local
a and Jan to the CC as I believe you both had comments on this
> previously. Apologies if I've forgotten anyone else that commented from the
> CC!
>
> Regards,
> /Billy
>
>> -Original Message-
>> From: Stokes, Ian
>> Sent: Thursday, May 11, 2017 12:0
I think this is helpful in some cases where lower performance is an acceptable
tradeoff with more frugal and/or more flexible usage of cpu resources.
I did not test it since Ian has already done that, but I reviewed
the code change and other related code.
One comment inline regarding the added do
okes, Ian
> Sent: Thursday, May 11, 2017 12:09 PM
> To: O Mahony, Billy ; d...@openvswitch.org
> Subject: RE: [ovs-dev] [PATCH v6] dpif-netdev: Assign ports to pmds on non-
> local numa node.
>
> > Previously if there is no available (non-isolated) pmd on the numa
> > node fo
> Previously if there is no available (non-isolated) pmd on the numa node
> for a port then the port is not polled at all. This can result in a non-
> operational system until such time as nics are physically repositioned. It
> is preferable to operate with a pmd on the 'wrong' numa node albeit wit
From: billyom
Previously if there is no available (non-isolated) pmd on the numa node
for a port then the port is not polled at all. This can result in a
non-operational system until such time as nics are physically
repositioned. It is preferable to operate with a pmd on the 'wrong' numa
node alb
12 matches
Mail list logo
