On Fri, Mar 3, 2023 at 4:00 PM Roi Dayan wrote:
>
>
> On 01/03/2023 14:01, Ales Musil wrote:
> > On Wed, Mar 1, 2023 at 12:34 PM Roi Dayan wrote:
> >
> >>
> >>
> >> On 01/03/2023 12:53, Roi Dayan via dev wrote:
> >>>
> >>>
> >>> On 16/01/2023 13:45, Ales Musil wrote:
> Currently, the CT
On 01/03/2023 14:01, Ales Musil wrote:
> On Wed, Mar 1, 2023 at 12:34 PM Roi Dayan wrote:
>
>>
>>
>> On 01/03/2023 12:53, Roi Dayan via dev wrote:
>>>
>>>
>>> On 16/01/2023 13:45, Ales Musil wrote:
Currently, the CT can be flushed by dpctl only by specifying
the whole 5-tuple. This
On Wed, Mar 1, 2023 at 12:34 PM Roi Dayan wrote:
>
>
> On 01/03/2023 12:53, Roi Dayan via dev wrote:
> >
> >
> > On 16/01/2023 13:45, Ales Musil wrote:
> >> Currently, the CT can be flushed by dpctl only by specifying
> >> the whole 5-tuple. This is not very convenient when there are
> >> only
On 01/03/2023 12:53, Roi Dayan via dev wrote:
>
>
> On 16/01/2023 13:45, Ales Musil wrote:
>> Currently, the CT can be flushed by dpctl only by specifying
>> the whole 5-tuple. This is not very convenient when there are
>> only some fields known to the user of CT flush. Add new struct
>>
On 16/01/2023 13:45, Ales Musil wrote:
> Currently, the CT can be flushed by dpctl only by specifying
> the whole 5-tuple. This is not very convenient when there are
> only some fields known to the user of CT flush. Add new struct
> ofputil_ct_match which represents the generic filtering that
Bleep bloop. Greetings Ales Musil, I am a robot and I have tried out your
patch.
Thanks for your contribution.
I encountered some error that I wasn't expecting. See the details below.
checkpatch:
WARNING: Line is 106 characters long (recommended limit is 79)
#619 FILE: lib/dpctl.man:305:
Currently, the CT can be flushed by dpctl only by specifying
the whole 5-tuple. This is not very convenient when there are
only some fields known to the user of CT flush. Add new struct
ofputil_ct_match which represents the generic filtering that can
be done for CT flush. The match is done only on
