On 12/05/2021 03:11, Flavio Leitner wrote:
> The results show that this new patch-set addressed the main
> thundering herd issue and the scalability issue I reported
> during V10 review.
>
> Unfortunately I can review the patches only next week.
Thanks again for testing and reviewing. Sorry for
On 12/05/2021 03:11, Flavio Leitner wrote:
> Hi,
>
> On Fri, Apr 30, 2021 at 11:31:26AM -0400, Mark Gray wrote:
>> This series proposes a new method of distributing upcalls
>> to user space threads attempting to resolve a number of
>> issues with the current method.
>>
>
> I ran some tests with
Hi,
On Fri, Apr 30, 2021 at 11:31:26AM -0400, Mark Gray wrote:
> This series proposes a new method of distributing upcalls
> to user space threads attempting to resolve a number of
> issues with the current method.
>
I ran some tests with old V10, current master and this RFC
including the
On 30/04/2021 16:31, Mark Gray wrote:
> This series proposes a new method of distributing upcalls
> to user space threads attempting to resolve a number of
> issues with the current method.
>
> Mark Gray (3):
> ofproto: change type of n_handlers and n_revalidators
> dpif-netlink: fix
On 30/04/2021 16:31, Mark Gray wrote:
> This series proposes a new method of distributing upcalls
> to user space threads attempting to resolve a number of
> issues with the current method.
>
> Mark Gray (3):
> ofproto: change type of n_handlers and n_revalidators
> dpif-netlink: fix
This series proposes a new method of distributing upcalls
to user space threads attempting to resolve a number of
issues with the current method.
Mark Gray (3):
ofproto: change type of n_handlers and n_revalidators
dpif-netlink: fix report_loss() message
dpif-netlink: Introduce per-cpu
