On Mon, Aug 6, 2018 at 10:30 PM, Han Zhou wrote:
>
>
>
> On Mon, Aug 6, 2018 at 3:13 AM, Mark Michelson
wrote:
> >
> > Hi Han,
> >
> > I thought about this more over the weekend, and I was hoping I'd get to
respond to my own e-mail before you saw it, because I realized I had a
fundamental misunde
On Mon, Aug 6, 2018 at 3:13 AM, Mark Michelson wrote:
>
> Hi Han,
>
> I thought about this more over the weekend, and I was hoping I'd get to
respond to my own e-mail before you saw it, because I realized I had a
fundamental misunderstanding of the scope and nature of change handlers.
I'll reply t
Hi Han,
I thought about this more over the weekend, and I was hoping I'd get to
respond to my own e-mail before you saw it, because I realized I had a
fundamental misunderstanding of the scope and nature of change handlers.
I'll reply to your comments in-line below.
On 08/05/2018 03:11 PM, H
Hi Mark,
Thanks for the review and very valuable comments! (I was on vacation last
week so sorry for slow response).
On Tue, Jul 31, 2018 at 3:47 AM, Mark Michelson wrote:
>
> Hi Han,
>
> I've given this patchset a look, and I was following along pretty well
until I got to about patch 11. From t
Hi Han,
I've given this patchset a look, and I was following along pretty well
until I got to about patch 11. From that point on, I had to re-read the
code more times than I care to admit before I finally understood what
was going on :)
What you have is a structure (lflow_ref_list_node) that
This patch series is the rebase of previous patch series [1] on top of master
where a series of changes that avoided passing ovsdb IDL (eaa4ead5) has been
merged. The major concern of the previous patches are the maintainability
of the dependencies. This patch series, thanks for the removal of pass
