On 06/02/2017 06:39 PM, Stokes, Ian wrote:
>> -Original Message-
>> From: ovs-dev-boun...@openvswitch.org [mailto:ovs-dev-
>> boun...@openvswitch.org] On Behalf Of Kevin Traynor
>> Sent: Friday, May 5, 2017 5:34 PM
>> To: d...@openvswitch.org
>> Subje
> -Original Message-
> From: ovs-dev-boun...@openvswitch.org [mailto:ovs-dev-
> boun...@openvswitch.org] On Behalf Of Kevin Traynor
> Sent: Friday, May 5, 2017 5:34 PM
> To: d...@openvswitch.org
> Subject: [ovs-dev] [RFC PATCH 0/6] Change dpdk rxq scheduling to
> incor
;
>> -Original Message-
>> From: ovs-dev-boun...@openvswitch.org
>> [mailto:ovs-dev-boun...@openvswitch.org] On Behalf Of Kevin Traynor
>> Sent: Friday, 05 May, 2017 18:34
>> To: d...@openvswitch.org
>> Subject: [ovs-dev] [RFC PATCH 0/6] Change dpdk rx
>> Thanks for working on this. This work is important and would also solve OvS-
>DPDK scaling issue.
>> I have reviewed the patch series but haven't tested this yet with traffic. I
>would stick to comments on high level design at his stage.
>>
>> With this series, rxqs are sorted based on cycles co
8:34
> To: d...@openvswitch.org
> Subject: [ovs-dev] [RFC PATCH 0/6] Change dpdk rxq scheduling to incorporate
> rxq processing cycles.
>
> Rxqs are scheduled to be handled across available pmds in round robin
> order with no weight or priority.
>
> It can happen that some ver
Hi Bhanu,
On 05/21/2017 10:25 PM, Bodireddy, Bhanuprakash wrote:
> Hello Kevin,
>
>>
>> Rxqs are scheduled to be handled across available pmds in round robin order
>> with no weight or priority.
>>
>> It can happen that some very busy queues are handled by one pmd which
>> does not have enough cy
Hello Kevin,
>
>Rxqs are scheduled to be handled across available pmds in round robin order
>with no weight or priority.
>
>It can happen that some very busy queues are handled by one pmd which
>does not have enough cycles to prevent packets being dropped on them.
>While at the same time another p
On Mon, 2017-05-08 at 11:49 +0100, Kevin Traynor wrote:
> On 05/06/2017 02:01 AM, Greg Rose wrote:
> > On Fri, May 5, 2017 at 9:34 AM, Kevin Traynor wrote:
> >> Rxqs are scheduled to be handled across available pmds in round robin
> >> order with no weight or priority.
> >>
> >> It can happen that
On 05/06/2017 02:01 AM, Greg Rose wrote:
> On Fri, May 5, 2017 at 9:34 AM, Kevin Traynor wrote:
>> Rxqs are scheduled to be handled across available pmds in round robin
>> order with no weight or priority.
>>
>> It can happen that some very busy queues are handled by one pmd which
>> does not have
On Fri, May 5, 2017 at 9:34 AM, Kevin Traynor wrote:
> Rxqs are scheduled to be handled across available pmds in round robin
> order with no weight or priority.
>
> It can happen that some very busy queues are handled by one pmd which
> does not have enough cycles to prevent packets being dropped
Rxqs are scheduled to be handled across available pmds in round robin
order with no weight or priority.
It can happen that some very busy queues are handled by one pmd which
does not have enough cycles to prevent packets being dropped on them.
While at the same time another pmd which handles queue
11 matches
Mail list logo
