Hi Han, I had some time to get back to this. See my comments below.
On 10/21/19 4:01 PM, Han Zhou wrote:
Hi Mark,
Thanks for the patch. We had a brief discussion during last OVN meeting.
Let me put my points inlined.
On Fri, Oct 18, 2019 at 1:43 PM Mark Michelson
Hi Mark,
Thanks for the patch. We had a brief discussion during last OVN meeting.
Let me put my points inlined.
On Fri, Oct 18, 2019 at 1:43 PM Mark Michelson wrote:
>
> This proposes a set of patches to move pinctrl operations out of the
> ovn-controller process and into its own.
>
> The main
I realized that after my latest rebase, there are three tests that are
failing with this changeset:
IGMP snoop/querier/relay
ARP lookup before learning
vtep 3HVs, 1 VIFs/HV, 1 GW, 1 LS
They don't fail in master, so I know they're the fault of the branch.
With that in mind, I will fix these
On Fri, Oct 18, 2019 at 04:42:54PM -0400, Mark Michelson wrote:
> This proposes a set of patches to move pinctrl operations out of the
> ovn-controller process and into its own.
Interesting! I would not have guessed that the operations were
independent enough to make this practical.
I have not
This proposes a set of patches to move pinctrl operations out of the
ovn-controller process and into its own.
The main reasons for doing this are the following:
1) Separating pinctrl makes it so that receiving a packet-in can't wake
up ovn-controller.
2) Separating pinctrl allows for manipulating
