On Thu, Feb 2, 2017 at 3:22 PM, wrote:
> From: John McDowall
>
> This patchset is the first round at having Service Function Chaining
> functionality through OVN. The implementation is done entirely
> on the northbound side of OVN.
The approach of using OVN logical ports to build the chain seems clean,
but I wonder whether it's general-purpose enough to do what users want.
If not, that is, if some users want to use physical appliances rather
than VMs or containers that are integrated into OVN, the question arises
of how to
Ben,
Thanks for the thorough review, I will update the code and resubmit the patch.
Any thoughts on the general approach to service chaining etc?
Regards
John
On 2/3/17, 2:10 PM, "Ben Pfaff" wrote:
On Thu, Feb 02, 2017 at 03:22:56PM -0800, jmcdow...@paloaltonetworks.com
On Thu, Feb 02, 2017 at 03:22:56PM -0800, jmcdow...@paloaltonetworks.com wrote:
> From: John McDowall
>
> This patchset is the first round at having Service Function Chaining
> functionality through OVN. The implementation is done entirely
> on the northbound side
From: John McDowall
This patchset is the first round at having Service Function Chaining
functionality through OVN. The implementation is done entirely
on the northbound side of OVN. It is a bump on the wire implementation,
so no attempt is being made in keeping