Hi Flavio,
Thanks for the info. My response is inline.
Cian
> -Original Message-
> From: Flavio Leitner
> Sent: Tuesday 6 July 2021 20:36
> To: Ferriter, Cian
> Cc: ovs-dev@openvswitch.org; i.maxim...@ovn.org
> Subject: Re: [ovs-dev] [v14 01/11] dpif-netdev: Re
On Thu, Jul 01, 2021 at 04:06:09PM +0100, Cian Ferriter wrote:
> From: Harry van Haaren
>
> Split the very large file dpif-netdev.c and the datastructures
> it contains into multiple header files. Each header file is
> responsible for the datastructures of that component.
>
> This logical split
On Tue, Jul 06, 2021 at 04:20:59PM -0300, Flavio Leitner wrote:
>
> Hi,
>
> I was reviewing the patch while testing and I can consistently
> loss 1Mpps (or more) on a P2P scenario with this flow table:
> ovs-ofctl add-flow br0 in_port=dpdk0,actions=output:dpdk1
>
> TX: 14Mpps
> RX without
Hi,
I was reviewing the patch while testing and I can consistently
loss 1Mpps (or more) on a P2P scenario with this flow table:
ovs-ofctl add-flow br0 in_port=dpdk0,actions=output:dpdk1
TX: 14Mpps
RX without patch: +12.6Mpps
RX with patch: 11.67Mpps
CPU: Intel(R) Xeon(R) Silver 4114 CPU @
Bleep bloop. Greetings Cian Ferriter, I am a robot and I have tried out your
patch.
Thanks for your contribution.
I encountered some error that I wasn't expecting. See the details below.
checkpatch:
ERROR: Inappropriate bracing around statement
#530 FILE: lib/dpif-netdev-private-dpcls.h:97:
From: Harry van Haaren
Split the very large file dpif-netdev.c and the datastructures
it contains into multiple header files. Each header file is
responsible for the datastructures of that component.
This logical split allows better reuse and modularity of the code,
and reduces the very large
