On Thu, Feb 20, 2020 at 11:39:21AM -0800, William Tu wrote:
> On Tue, Feb 4, 2020 at 9:12 AM Flavio Leitner wrote:
> >
> > On Tue, Feb 04, 2020 at 12:00:19PM -0300, Flavio Leitner wrote:
> > > On Tue, Feb 04, 2020 at 12:51:24AM +, Yi Yang (杨�D)-云服务集团 wrote:
> > > > Hi, Flavio
> > The code is
On Tue, Feb 04, 2020 at 12:00:19PM -0300, Flavio Leitner wrote:
> On Tue, Feb 04, 2020 at 12:51:24AM +, Yi Yang (杨�D)-云服务集团 wrote:
> > Hi, Flavio
> >
> > With this one patch and previous several merged TSO-related patches, can
> > veth work with "ethtool -K vethX tx on"? I always can't figure
On Tue, Feb 04, 2020 at 12:51:24AM +, Yi Yang (杨�D)-云服务集团 wrote:
> Hi, Flavio
>
> With this one patch and previous several merged TSO-related patches, can
> veth work with "ethtool -K vethX tx on"? I always can't figure out why veth
> can work in dpdk data path when tx offload features are
Hi, Flavio
With this one patch and previous several merged TSO-related patches, can
veth work with "ethtool -K vethX tx on"? I always can't figure out why veth
can work in dpdk data path when tx offload features are on, it looks like
you're fixing this big issue, right?
For tap interface, it
