Re: [ovs-dev] 答复: Why is ovs DPDK much worse than ovs in my test case?

2019-07-11 Thread Ilya Maximets
; tx-udp_tnl-segmentation: off [fixed] > fcoe-mtu: off [fixed] > tx-nocache-copy: off > loopback: off [fixed] > rx-fcs: off [fixed] > rx-all: off [fixed] > tx-vlan-stag-hw-insert: off [fixed] > rx-vlan-stag-hw-parse: off [fixed] > rx-vlan-stag-filter: off [fixed] > l2-

[ovs-dev] 答复: Why is ovs DPDK much worse than ovs in my test case?

2019-07-10 Thread 杨燚
much worse than ovs in my test case? 重要性: 高 Ilya, thank you so much, using 9K MTU for all the virtio interfaces in transport path does help (including DPDK port), the data is here. vagrant@client1:~$ iperf -t 60 -i 10 -c 192.168.230.101

[ovs-dev] 答复: Why is ovs DPDK much worse than ovs in my test case?

2019-07-10 Thread 杨燚
Ilya, thank you so much, using 9K MTU for all the virtio interfaces in transport path does help (including DPDK port), the data is here. vagrant@client1:~$ iperf -t 60 -i 10 -c 192.168.230.101 Client connecting to 192.168.230.101, TCP