top posting for convenience sake...
David and Ben,
I've found a fix for this and am preparing a patch for the Linux kernel
list. We'll see what the
Linux maintainers think, but it's pretty basic and I can't see why they
would object. But ya
never know.
Thanks,
- Greg
On 12/20/2019 1:13
On 12/20/2019 11:53 AM, David Ahern wrote:
On 12/20/19 11:14 AM, Gregory Rose wrote:
On 12/19/2019 7:20 PM, Gregory Rose wrote:
Bisecting is hard when you're doing it across 10s of thousands of
Linux revisions but after a few fitsand starts I think it's this
patch:
commit 9b9a3f20cbe0ba9269cd
On 12/20/19 11:14 AM, Gregory Rose wrote:
>
> On 12/19/2019 7:20 PM, Gregory Rose wrote:
>>
>> Bisecting is hard when you're doing it across 10s of thousands of
>> Linux revisions but after a few fitsand starts I think it's this
>> patch:
>>
>> commit 9b9a3f20cbe0ba9269cde6fff9f9c69907e150cf
>> Au
On 12/19/2019 7:20 PM, Gregory Rose wrote:
Bisecting is hard when you're doing it across 10s of thousands of
Linux revisions but after a few fitsand starts I think it's this
patch:
commit 9b9a3f20cbe0ba9269cde6fff9f9c69907e150cf
Author: Masahiro Yamada
Date: Thu Aug 15 01:06:23 2019 +0900
On 12/11/2019 3:33 PM, David Ahern wrote:
On 12/11/19 12:17 PM, Gregory Rose wrote:
Hi David,
I just want to update you on this work. I've got everything fixed up
and compiling
on 5.4.2 but in the modpostsection there are a lot of bizarre errors.
I'm not sure where
this comes from so I'm track
On 12/11/19 12:17 PM, Gregory Rose wrote:
>
> Hi David,
>
> I just want to update you on this work. I've got everything fixed up
> and compiling
> on 5.4.2 but in the modpostsection there are a lot of bizarre errors.
> I'm not sure where
> this comes from so I'm tracking that down. Unfortunate
On 12/5/2019 8:11 PM, David Ahern wrote:
On 12/5/19 5:29 PM, Gregory Rose wrote:
On 12/5/2019 3:22 PM, Gregory Rose wrote:
On 12/5/2019 2:15 PM, Ben Pfaff wrote:
On Thu, Dec 05, 2019 at 01:14:54PM -0800, Gregory Rose wrote:
We try to keep our out of tree kernel modules compiling against rece
On Thu, Dec 05, 2019 at 04:29:12PM -0800, Gregory Rose wrote:
> I tried building against the 5.4.2 kernel from kernel.org and found the inet
> frags issue that David pointed out
> To see if there were any other problems I then I ran 'make -i' but found
> nothing else. It should just be
> a compat
On 12/5/19 5:29 PM, Gregory Rose wrote:
>
> On 12/5/2019 3:22 PM, Gregory Rose wrote:
>>
>> On 12/5/2019 2:15 PM, Ben Pfaff wrote:
>>> On Thu, Dec 05, 2019 at 01:14:54PM -0800, Gregory Rose wrote:
We try to keep our out of tree kernel modules compiling against recent
kernels and will eve
On 12/5/2019 3:22 PM, Gregory Rose wrote:
On 12/5/2019 2:15 PM, Ben Pfaff wrote:
On Thu, Dec 05, 2019 at 01:14:54PM -0800, Gregory Rose wrote:
We try to keep our out of tree kernel modules compiling against recent
kernels and will eventually add support for 5.4. Right now our
support is up t
On 12/5/2019 2:15 PM, Ben Pfaff wrote:
On Thu, Dec 05, 2019 at 01:14:54PM -0800, Gregory Rose wrote:
We try to keep our out of tree kernel modules compiling against recent
kernels and will eventually add support for 5.4. Right now our
support is up to 5.0.
My belief is that usually we're only
On Thu, Dec 05, 2019 at 01:14:54PM -0800, Gregory Rose wrote:
> We try to keep our out of tree kernel modules compiling against recent
> kernels and will eventually add support for 5.4. Right now our
> support is up to 5.0.
My belief is that usually we're only 1-2 releases behind, 4 is more than
On 12/5/2019 1:19 PM, David Ahern wrote:
On 12/5/19 2:14 PM, Gregory Rose wrote:
We try to keep our out of tree kernel modules compiling against recent
kernels and
will eventually add support for 5.4. Right now our support is up to
5.0. However,
you can just build the user space code and not
On 12/5/19 2:14 PM, Gregory Rose wrote:
>
> We try to keep our out of tree kernel modules compiling against recent
> kernels and
> will eventually add support for 5.4. Right now our support is up to
> 5.0. However,
> you can just build the user space code and not bother with building the
> out o
On 12/5/2019 11:52 AM, David Ahern wrote:
Hi:
I am trying to compile ovs code from github for the 5.4 kernel and the
module builds are failing (excerpt pasted below). Is anyone working on
moving the out of tree modules forward to 5.4 now that it is released
and targeted as an LTS?
Thanks,
David
Hi:
I am trying to compile ovs code from github for the 5.4 kernel and the
module builds are failing (excerpt pasted below). Is anyone working on
moving the out of tree modules forward to 5.4 now that it is released
and targeted as an LTS?
Thanks,
David
/home/dahern/oss/ovs.git/datapath/linux/c
16 matches
Mail list logo
