On 10/08/2023 15:26, Ilya Maximets wrote:
> On 8/10/23 09:59, Roi Dayan wrote:
>> Hi,
>>
>> We noticed a possible memory leak in netdev_tc_init_flow_api()
>> as we allocate memory for meter_police_ids with id_pool_create()
>> but we never destroy it.
>
> Hi, Roi.
>
> I'd not consider this as a
On 8/10/23 09:59, Roi Dayan wrote:
> Hi,
>
> We noticed a possible memory leak in netdev_tc_init_flow_api()
> as we allocate memory for meter_police_ids with id_pool_create()
> but we never destroy it.
Hi, Roi.
I'd not consider this as a leak. The pool is allocated once and
stored in a static m
Hi,
We noticed a possible memory leak in netdev_tc_init_flow_api()
as we allocate memory for meter_police_ids with id_pool_create()
but we never destroy it.
I added a code to refcount netdev_tc_init_flow_api and so in
netdev_tc_uninit_flow_api() to destroy it and noticed some behavior
about ovs-s
