ted is_switch instead of querying
> external IDs.")
> Signed-off-by: Han Zhou
Acked-by: Numan Siddique
Numan
> ---
> controller/lflow.c | 4 ++--
> 1 file changed, 2 insertions(+), 2 deletions(-)
>
> diff --git a/controller/lflow.c b/controller/lflow.c
> index
On Wed, Feb 23, 2022 at 8:22 PM Han Zhou wrote:
>
> On Wed, Feb 23, 2022 at 3:24 PM Numan Siddique wrote:
> >
> > On Tue, Feb 8, 2022 at 5:28 AM Dumitru Ceara wrote:
> > >
> > > We already store whether a datapath is a switch or not. No need to do
> >
On Wed, Feb 23, 2022 at 7:57 PM Han Zhou wrote:
>
> On Wed, Feb 23, 2022 at 2:51 PM Numan Siddique wrote:
> >
> > On Tue, Feb 22, 2022 at 10:18 AM Numan Siddique wrote:
> > >
> > > On Thu, Feb 17, 2022 at 5:54 PM Han Zhou wrote:
> > > >
> &
On Thu, Feb 17, 2022 at 12:34 PM Lorenzo Bianconi
wrote:
>
> Introduce nat-only-router flag for nat-addresses option in order to
> advertise in GARPs packets all SNAT/DNAT configured in the connected
> logical router but skip all configured load_balancers.
>
> Reported-at: https://bugzilla.redhat.
On Thu, Feb 24, 2022 at 11:17 AM Mark Michelson wrote:
>
> On 2/23/22 19:39, Numan Siddique wrote:
> > On Wed, Feb 23, 2022 at 7:22 AM Frode Nordahl
> > wrote:
> >>
> >> Hello Mark,
> >>
> >> This overall looks great, it also looks like
llowing for the behavior
> > to be similar for both ACL types. Since logging reply traffic requires
> > adding more flows, it is not enabled by default. In order to have reply
> > traffic logged, the ACL must have logging enabled, be stateful, have a
> > label, and have the
On Thu, Feb 24, 2022 at 11:06 AM Dumitru Ceara wrote:
>
> This series addresses two independent issues:
> - ovn-kubernetes needs to be built against the NB/SB schema defined in
> the OVN tree we're running the test for.
> - ovn-kubernetes bumped go and k8s versions and we should do the same
>
On Thu, Feb 24, 2022 at 5:23 PM Lorenzo Bianconi
wrote:
>
> The CMS can configure the same lbs on multiple gw routers so the
> same IPs/mac bindings will be adverised by multiple routers
> through GARPs.
> In order to fix the issue, introduce nat-only-router flag for
> nat-addresses option in orde
On Thu, Feb 24, 2022 at 5:01 PM Mark Michelson wrote:
>
> Signed-off-by: Mark Michelson
Acked-by: Numan Siddique
Numan
> ---
> NEWS | 4 ++--
> configure.ac | 2 +-
> debian/changelog | 4 ++--
> 3 files changed, 5 insertions(+), 5 deletions(-)
>
&g
On Thu, Feb 24, 2022 at 5:00 PM Mark Michelson wrote:
>
> Signed-off-by: Mark Michelson
Acked-by: Numan Siddique
Numan
> ---
> NEWS | 3 +++
> configure.ac | 2 +-
> debian/changelog | 6 ++
> 3 files changed, 10 insertions(+), 1 deletion(-)
>
&g
On Fri, Feb 25, 2022 at 2:00 AM Han Zhou wrote:
>
> On Thu, Feb 24, 2022 at 3:07 PM wrote:
> >
> > From: Numan Siddique
> >
> > The following commits are required for OVN:
> >
> > 498cedc48 reconnect: Fix broken inactivity probe if there is no other
On Fri, Feb 25, 2022 at 9:25 AM Lorenzo Bianconi
wrote:
>
> The CMS can configure the same lbs on multiple gw routers so the
> same VIPs will be adverised by multiple routers through GARPs.
> In order to fix the issue, introduce exclude-lb-vips-from-garp
> option in the logical_switch_port table i
On Fri, Feb 25, 2022 at 1:20 PM Mark Michelson wrote:
>
> On 2/25/22 10:26, Ilya Maximets wrote:
> > On 2/25/22 16:19, Numan Siddique wrote:
> >> On Fri, Feb 25, 2022 at 2:00 AM Han Zhou wrote:
> >>>
> >>> On Thu, Feb 24, 2022 at 3:07
Hi,
Can you please fix the below compilation issue and submit another version ?
Thanks
Numan
On Tue, Feb 22, 2022 at 7:39 AM 0-day Robot wrote:
>
> Bleep bloop. Greetings 294754599--- via dev, I am a robot and I have tried
> out your patch.
> Thanks for your contribution.
>
> I encountered s
On Fri, Feb 4, 2022 at 11:03 AM Xavier Simonart wrote:
>
> Tests were waiting for ports to be reported up before sending packets.
> However, waiting for both ports to be up is not enough to guarantee
> that all flows are installed for both ports.
> We now wait for flows outputting to patch port to
On Thu, Feb 17, 2022 at 10:17 AM Ihar Hrachyshka wrote:
>
> Right now it logs diff between expected and observed only when enough
> packets arrived. If less than expected packets arrived, only the
> number of packets observed was logged, but not the packets themselves.
> This patch makes the funct
On Thu, Feb 17, 2022 at 10:18 AM Ihar Hrachyshka wrote:
>
> When the expected number of packets arrive, OVN_CHECK_PACKETS_CONTAIN
> bails out. But it should bail out from waiting only when the expected
> packets were observed or when timeout reached, because the whole point
> of the function is to
On Thu, Mar 3, 2022 at 5:08 AM Dumitru Ceara wrote:
>
> Commit 974618c61de8 ("ovn-ic: physical: Support multicast_group flooding
> on IC transit switches.") added support for statically forwarding IP
> multicast traffic between AZs. While this works, it's a waste of
> resources to flood all IP mu
On Fri, Mar 4, 2022 at 8:10 AM Lorenzo Bianconi
wrote:
>
> There is a small race where gw-router-port can be running on both
> hvs and both of them can reply to the arp request ending up with
> two arp replies in the pcap file. This is transitory not significant
> in a real deployment that can tri
On Tue, Mar 8, 2022 at 9:51 AM Dumitru Ceara wrote:
>
> On 3/7/22 18:46, num...@ovn.org wrote:
> > From: Numan Siddique
> >
> > Presently for ACLs and LBs we do the following in the logical switch
> > ingress pipeline
> >
> >1. Send the packet to co
On Wed, Mar 9, 2022, 5:53 PM Han Zhou wrote:
> On Tue, Mar 8, 2022 at 8:02 AM Numan Siddique wrote:
> >
> > On Tue, Mar 8, 2022 at 9:51 AM Dumitru Ceara wrote:
> > >
> > > On 3/7/22 18:46, num...@ovn.org wrote:
> > > > From: Numan Siddique
> &g
On Thu, Mar 10, 2022 at 4:22 AM Dumitru Ceara wrote:
>
> On 3/10/22 04:04, num...@ovn.org wrote:
> > From: Numan Siddique
> >
>
> Hi Numan,
>
> > Presently, if the inport or outport is a peer port (of router port),
> > then we skip sending the packet to
On Thu, Mar 17, 2022 at 6:39 AM 黄海伦 wrote:
>
> Hi,
>
>
> In OVN logical flows table, the table number of Router policies table
> (lr_in_policy) in ovn logical router is 13, and IP Routing
> table(lr_in_ip_routing) is 11.
> The priority of router policy route is higher than that of static route i
On Tue, Mar 8, 2022 at 3:27 AM Dumitru Ceara wrote:
>
> Signed-off-by: Dumitru Ceara
Thanks. Applied to the main branch.
Numan
> ---
> NEWS | 2 ++
> 1 file changed, 2 insertions(+)
>
> diff --git a/NEWS b/NEWS
> index 9648f6cb21..5ba9c3cf4c 100644
> --- a/NEWS
> +++ b/NEWS
> @@ -1,5 +1,7 @@
On Wed, Mar 9, 2022 at 4:39 AM Dumitru Ceara wrote:
>
> This is not supported and ovn-northd was not logging it properly.
> The previous attempt tried to log in init_nat_entries() but there
> the logical router port configuration has not yet been parsed.
>
> Move the check and log instead to where
On Wed, Mar 9, 2022 at 4:40 AM Dumitru Ceara wrote:
>
> Signed-off-by: Dumitru Ceara
Thanks. Applied to the main branch.
Numan
> ---
> northd/northd.c | 4 ++--
> 1 file changed, 2 insertions(+), 2 deletions(-)
>
> diff --git a/northd/northd.c b/northd/northd.c
> index 7f309098e1..4ad0ec5821
On Thu, Mar 17, 2022 at 11:46 AM Numan Siddique wrote:
>
> On Wed, Mar 9, 2022 at 4:39 AM Dumitru Ceara wrote:
> >
> > This is not supported and ovn-northd was not logging it properly.
> > The previous attempt tried to log in init_nat_entries() but there
> > the log
On Tue, Mar 15, 2022 at 2:28 PM Lorenzo Bianconi
wrote:
>
> Allow the CMS to explicitly configure nat addresses to use in
> GARP advertising even if the logical switch port is connected
> to a distributed gateway router port.
>
> Signed-off-by: Lorenzo Bianconi
Thanks. Applied to the main branc
On Wed, Mar 16, 2022 at 12:11 PM Dumitru Ceara wrote:
>
> This commit doesn't change any functionality, it just performs the
> following refactor work:
>
> a. consolidates the old build_ovn_lbs(), build_lrouter_lbs() and
>build_ovn_lr_lbs() functions into a single function, build_lbs(),
>t
On Wed, Mar 9, 2022 at 2:38 PM Mark Michelson wrote:
>
> Commit 4deac4509abbedd6ffaecf27eed01ddefccea40a introduced functionality
> in ovn-northd to use a single zone for SNAT and DNAT when possible. It
> accounts for certain situations, such as hairpinned traffic, where we
> still need a separate
Thanks for fixing this.
Acked-by: Numan Siddique
Numan
> ---
> ovn-sb.xml | 29 ++---
> 1 file changed, 18 insertions(+), 11 deletions(-)
>
> diff --git a/ovn-sb.xml b/ovn-sb.xml
> index f7c41ccdc..3afea4ed4 100644
> ---
Thanks for fixing this.
Acked-by: Numan Siddique
Numan
> ---
> ovn-sb.xml | 29 ++---
> 1 file changed, 18 insertions(+), 11 deletions(-)
>
> diff --git a/ovn-sb.xml b/ovn-sb.xml
> index f7c41ccdc..3afea4ed4 100644
> ---
abel to ct_mark while keeping the backward compatibility.
>
> Signed-off-by: Han Zhou
Acked-by: Numan Siddique
Numan
> ---
> include/ovn/actions.h | 3 ++-
> lib/actions.c | 55 ---
> ovn-sb.xml| 10 +
On Mon, Mar 21, 2022 at 12:21 PM Numan Siddique wrote:
>
> On Sun, Mar 13, 2022 at 8:01 PM Han Zhou wrote:
> >
> > Add a new action ct_lb_mark, which is the same as ct_lb except that it
> > internally uses ct_mark to store the NAT flag, while ct_lb uses ct_label
> &
On Mon, Mar 21, 2022 at 12:26 PM Numan Siddique wrote:
>
> On Mon, Mar 21, 2022 at 12:21 PM Numan Siddique wrote:
> >
> > On Sun, Mar 13, 2022 at 8:01 PM Han Zhou wrote:
> > >
> > > Add a new action ct_lb_mark, which is the same as ct_lb except that it
> &
On Mon, Mar 14, 2022 at 7:10 AM Mohammad Heib wrote:
>
> currently pinctrl main thread uses some shash lists
> that were supplied by ovn-controller main thread to prepare
> and send IPv6 RAs, those lists are not updated properly when
> LRP is deleted and can cause some invalid memory access
> in t
as
> some tests are not run through OVN_FOR_EACH_NORTHD. Instead use for instance
> make check TESTSUITEFLAGS="-k parallelization=yes" and
> make check TESTSUITEFLAGS="-k \!parallelization=yes" to run all tests
>
> If less than four physical cores are avail
On Thu, Mar 10, 2022 at 2:42 PM wrote:
> From: Numan Siddique
>
> Presently, if the inport or outport is a peer port (of router port),
> then we skip sending the packet to conntrack by not setting the
> reg0[0]/reg0[1] bits. But the packet still goes through the
> stage
On Wed, Mar 23, 2022 at 2:13 PM Han Zhou wrote:
>
> On Wed, Mar 23, 2022 at 9:42 AM Numan Siddique wrote:
> >
> > On Tue, Mar 22, 2022 at 2:54 PM Han Zhou wrote:
> > >
> > > Some NICs support HW offloading for datapath flows, but masked access to
> >
On Wed, Mar 23, 2022 at 2:39 PM Han Zhou wrote:
>
> On Wed, Mar 23, 2022 at 11:26 AM Numan Siddique wrote:
> >
> > On Wed, Mar 23, 2022 at 2:13 PM Han Zhou wrote:
> > >
> > > On Wed, Mar 23, 2022 at 9:42 AM Numan Siddique wrote:
> > > >
> &g
On Tue, Mar 22, 2022 at 12:31 PM Mark Michelson wrote:
>
> Hi everyone,
>
> Last month, commit d7514abe1 (acl-log: Log the direction (logical
> pipeline) of the matching ACL.) was added to the main branch of OVN.
> This commit was made because of the issue report at
> https://bugzilla.redhat.com/s
On Tue, Mar 22, 2022 at 2:33 PM Mark Michelson wrote:
>
> Acked-by: Mark Michelson
>
Thanks.
I applied this patch to the main branch and backported upto branch-21.03.
Numan
> On 3/22/22 13:37, Vladislav Odintsov wrote:
> > If rpm is built with libcapng (default), /etc/logrotate.d/ovn
> > confi
On Thu, Mar 24, 2022 at 4:47 PM Mark Michelson wrote:
>
> Hi Numan,
>
> This message got buried in my inbox, so sorry about only replying now. I
> have some replies in-line below
>
> On 3/18/22 16:34, Numan Siddique wrote:
> > On Wed, Mar 9, 2022 at 2:38 PM Mark Michels
0220329201800.462820-1-mmich...@redhat.com/
I manually deleted the above few lines and then I was able to apply
the patch locally.
Please fix this issue before applying.
Acked-by: Numan Siddique
Numan
> The data is correct, but the test is being too strict about the expected
> ordering o
On Mon, Mar 28, 2022 at 1:48 AM Han Zhou wrote:
>
> Add an engine node en_northd_internal_version as an input to
> en_lflow_output. When this node is updated, it triggers a recompute for
> en_lflow_output. This node adds SB_Global as its only input, and it is
> updated only when SB_Global's option
; traffic breaking during upgrading. It relies on the
> northd-internal-version to internally determine if it is currently
> upgrading from a version that requires the ct_label flows being
> kept, and automatically removes the flows when northd-internal-version
> is up-to-date.
>
&g
On Tue, Mar 29, 2022 at 5:43 PM Han Zhou wrote:
>
> On Tue, Mar 29, 2022 at 2:19 PM Numan Siddique wrote:
> >
> > On Mon, Mar 28, 2022 at 1:48 AM Han Zhou wrote:
> > >
> > > Add an engine node en_northd_internal_version as an input to
> > > e
ing hardware offload all the way off appears to resolve the issue,
> so this might as well be driver/firmware related. May I ask what
> card/driver/firmware you've been using this with?
>
Hi Frode,
This patch attempted to resolve this BZ -
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_
"
On Thu, Mar 24, 2022 at 12:14 PM Abhiram Sangana
wrote:
>
> Currently, if multiple distributed gateway ports (DGP) are configured
> on a logical router, NAT is disabled as part of commit 15348b7
> (northd: Multiple distributed gateway port support.)
>
> This patch adds a new column called "gate
On Wed, Mar 30, 2022 at 1:41 PM Abhiram Sangana
wrote:
>
> Hi Numan,
>
> Thanks for reviewing the patch
>
> On 30 Mar 2022, at 16:55, Numan Siddique
> mailto:num...@ovn.org>> wrote:
>
> I think the "gateway_port" column can be a weak reference to
>
if gateway_port is not set, then ignore that NAT entry in ovn-northd
And in the subsequent patch determine the gateway port if not specified.
@Mark Michelson do you have any comments on this?
Thanks
Numan
> Thanks,
> Abhiram Sangana
>
> > On 30 Mar 2022, at 19:32, Numan S
On Wed, Apr 6, 2022 at 8:08 AM Abhiram Sangana
wrote:
>
> Thanks for reviewing, Mark. Can we merge the patch if it looks good?
Thanks. I applied this patch to the main branch,
Numan
>
> Thanks,
> Abhiram Sangana
>
> > On 4 Apr 2022, at 21:05, Mark Michelson wrote:
> >
> > Hi Abhriam,
> >
> >
On Wed, Apr 6, 2022 at 9:16 AM Dumitru Ceara wrote:
>
> This was skipped by accident when the test was added.
>
> Fixes: 74d82e296f80 ("northd: Support the option to apply from-lport ACLs
> after load balancer.")
> Signed-off-by: Dumitru Ceara
Thanks for fixing this. I applied this patch to th
On Tue, Apr 5, 2022 at 3:56 PM Mark Michelson wrote:
>
> Thanks a bunch Xavier!
>
> Acked-by: Mark Michelson
Thanks for fixing this. I applied this patch to the main branch.
Numan
>
> On 3/30/22 07:26, Xavier Simonart wrote:
> > - options:requested-chassis for logical port
> > - NAT and Load
On Tue, Apr 5, 2022 at 12:07 PM Dumitru Ceara wrote:
>
> On 4/5/22 17:22, Mark Michelson wrote:
> > On 3/30/22 06:40, Xavier Simonart wrote:
> >> Hi Dumitru
> >>
> >> On Mon, Mar 21, 2022 at 12:02 PM Dumitru Ceara wrote:
> >>
> >>> On 3/21/22 10:56, Xavier Simonart wrote:
> - send gratuitous
On Wed, Apr 6, 2022 at 4:58 AM Frode Nordahl
wrote:
>
> On Wed, Mar 30, 2022 at 4:54 PM Numan Siddique wrote:
> >
> > On Wed, Mar 30, 2022 at 6:21 AM Frode Nordahl
> > wrote:
> > >
> > > On Wed, Mar 30, 2022 at 11:45 AM Frode Nordahl
On Tue, Apr 5, 2022 at 11:34 AM Mark Michelson wrote:
>
> Thanks Lorenzo,
>
> Acked-by: Mark Michelson
Thanks.
I applied this patch to the main branch and backported to branch-22.03
and branch-21.12.
Numan
>
> On 4/1/22 17:11, Lorenzo Bianconi wrote:
> > Remove meters created through set_mete
On Wed, Apr 6, 2022 at 9:56 AM Mark Michelson wrote:
>
> You don't need to resend the patch. Whoever merges this can fix the
> problem when they merge it.
>
> On 4/6/22 02:26, Vladislav Odintsov wrote:
> > Regarding the code style, should I resend patch or this can be fixed when
> > the patch get
On Tue, Apr 5, 2022 at 2:18 PM Mark Michelson wrote:
>
> Thanks Xavier. It's amazing this issue has been around so long.
>
The main reason this issue has not been an actual issue is because
generally a gateway router is connected to a join switch
and E-W traffic doesn't reach the gateway router
On Wed, Apr 6, 2022 at 12:11 PM Numan Siddique wrote:
>
> On Wed, Apr 6, 2022 at 4:58 AM Frode Nordahl
> wrote:
> >
> > On Wed, Mar 30, 2022 at 4:54 PM Numan Siddique wrote:
> > >
> > > On Wed, Mar 30, 2022 at 6:21 AM Frode Nordahl
> > > wrote:
On Wed, Mar 23, 2022 at 11:35 AM Dumitru Ceara wrote:
>
> Add check to see if the LR actually has NAT entries configured.
> Otherwise we spam the log unnecessarily.
>
> Fixes: b8194738c99e ("northd: Properly warn for NAT on LR with multiple gw
> ports.")
> Signed-off-by: Dumitru Ceara
Hi Dumitr
On Tue, Apr 5, 2022 at 10:21 AM Mark Michelson wrote:
>
> Thanks for the update Mohammad. I like this version much better.
>
> Acked-by: Mark Michelson
Thanks for the fix.
I applied this patch to the main and backported upto branch-21.09 with
the below changes as it would reduce the code.
On Fri, Apr 1, 2022 at 1:55 PM Mark Michelson wrote:
>
> Commit 4deac4509abbedd6ffaecf27eed01ddefccea40a introduced functionality
> in ovn-northd to use a single zone for SNAT and DNAT when possible. It
> accounts for certain situations, such as hairpinned traffic, where we
> still need a separate
On Fri, Apr 8, 2022 at 2:27 PM wrote:
>
> From: Karthik Chandrashekar
>
> Add a new NB and SB table for managing Static MAC_Binding entries.
> This table is currently supported for logical routers. OVN northd
> is responsible for propagating the values from NB to SB. OVN controller
> is responsib
On Fri, Apr 8, 2022 at 10:25 AM Dumitru Ceara wrote:
>
> On 4/1/22 22:10, Xavier Simonart wrote:
> > The issue might have caused potential memory leaks or crashes in northd
> >
> > Signed-off-by: Xavier Simonart
> > ---
>
> Looks good to me, thanks!
>
> Acked-by: Dumitru Ceara
Thanks. I applie
On Sat, Feb 5, 2022 at 12:12 AM Han Zhou wrote:
>
> On Fri, Feb 4, 2022 at 7:58 AM Mark Michelson wrote:
> >
> > As far as I can tell, this looks correct.
> >
> > Acked-by: Mark Michelson
>
> Thanks Mark. I applied it to the main branch.
Hi Han,
We have an issue in OVN 21.12 (and OVN 21.09) w
On Mon, Apr 11, 2022 at 12:37 PM Frode Nordahl
wrote:
>
> tor. 7. apr. 2022, 19:40 skrev Frode Nordahl :
>
> > On Thu, Apr 7, 2022 at 6:51 PM Numan Siddique wrote:
> > >
> > > On Wed, Apr 6, 2022 at 12:11 PM Numan Siddique wrote:
> > > >
> &g
On Tue, Apr 12, 2022 at 6:08 AM Dumitru Ceara wrote:
>
> On 4/12/22 10:02, Lorenzo Bianconi wrote:
> > Meter bucket configuration has been fixed in ovs commit
> > 7d742b509dd7 ("openvswitch: meter: remove rate from the
> > bucket size calculation"). Fix CoPP system test failures due to new ovs
> >
On Tue, Apr 12, 2022 at 8:06 PM Ihar Hrachyshka wrote:
>
> There's a discussion to have on the intended behavior of a port with 2+
> chassis when the switch is attached to localnet.
>
> In general, the patch series makes all chassis switch to tunneling when
> multiple chassis are set. (See patch 1
y adding the check for installed flows
> before making the decision to merge the "delete and add/update" entries.
> We will not merge if the installed flow doesn't match the desired flow
> finally added/update.
>
> Reported-by: François Rigault
> Reported-at: ht
On Wed, Apr 13, 2022 at 2:36 AM Han Zhou wrote:
>
> On Mon, Apr 11, 2022 at 2:05 PM Numan Siddique wrote:
> >
> > On Sat, Feb 5, 2022 at 12:12 AM Han Zhou wrote:
> > >
> > > On Fri, Feb 4, 2022 at 7:58 AM Mark Michelson
> wrote:
> > > &g
On Fri, Apr 1, 2022 at 7:23 AM Dumitru Ceara wrote:
>
> At a first glance, change tracking should never be allowed for
> write-only columns. However, some clients (e.g., ovn-northd) that are
> mostly exclusive writers of a database, use change tracking to avoid
> duplicating the IDL row records i
On Tue, Mar 29, 2022 at 8:48 PM Ihar Hrachyshka wrote:
>
> Right now consider_port_binding first extracts *a* tunnel for a
> chassis, then later in put_remote_port_redirect_overlay it fetches
> *the* proper tunnel before configuring encapsulation.
>
> Instead of doing it in two steps, just extract
On Tue, Mar 29, 2022 at 8:47 PM Ihar Hrachyshka wrote:
>
> This version of the series switched to supporting multiple chassis set in
> requested-chassis option. This allows for more than two chassis
> specified for the same port.
>
> Also, this series includes a patch that allows to disable tunnel
On Thu, Apr 14, 2022 at 4:54 PM Ihar Hrachyshka wrote:
>
> On 4/13/22 11:36 AM, Numan Siddique wrote:
> > On Tue, Apr 12, 2022 at 8:06 PM Ihar Hrachyshka wrote:
> >> There's a discussion to have on the intended behavior of a port with 2+
> >> chassis when
On Wed, Apr 20, 2022 at 1:15 PM Ihar Hrachyshka wrote:
>
> Thanks for your review. See below.
>
> On Tue, Apr 19, 2022 at 11:43 AM Numan Siddique wrote:
> >
> > On Tue, Mar 29, 2022 at 8:47 PM Ihar Hrachyshka wrote:
> > >
> > > This version of the seri
On Tue, Apr 12, 2022 at 11:01 AM Numan Siddique wrote:
>
> On Mon, Apr 11, 2022 at 12:37 PM Frode Nordahl
> wrote:
> >
> > tor. 7. apr. 2022, 19:40 skrev Frode Nordahl :
> >
> > > On Thu, Apr 7, 2022 at 6:51 PM Numan Siddique wrote:
> > > >
> &
On Thu, Apr 21, 2022 at 5:02 AM Frode Nordahl
wrote:
>
> On Wed, Apr 20, 2022 at 10:10 PM Numan Siddique wrote:
> >
> > On Tue, Apr 12, 2022 at 11:01 AM Numan Siddique wrote:
> > >
> > > On Mon, Apr 11, 2022 at 12:37 PM Frode Nordahl
> > > wrote:
&
On Mon, Apr 25, 2022, 8:59 AM Dumitru Ceara wrote:
> On 4/23/22 20:14, num...@ovn.org wrote:
> > From: Numan Siddique
> >
> > Presently OVN assumes that an IPv6 Neigh Adv packet will have the
> > target link layer option preset. But that's not the case all the
On Mon, Apr 25, 2022 at 10:20 AM Dumitru Ceara wrote:
>
> On 4/25/22 16:06, Numan Siddique wrote:
> > On Mon, Apr 25, 2022, 8:59 AM Dumitru Ceara wrote:
> >
> >> On 4/23/22 20:14, num...@ovn.org wrote:
> >>> From: Numan Siddique
> >>>
> &
; supported in the create command.
I think we can support something like - ovs-vsctl --id= create ...
What do you think ? I've incorporated it in v2. Please check it out.
>
> On 3/8/22 01:56, num...@ovn.org wrote:
> > From: Numan Siddique
> >
> > ovsdb-server a
On Tue, May 3, 2022 at 7:32 PM Han Zhou wrote:
>
> On Thu, Apr 28, 2022 at 9:36 AM Dumitru Ceara wrote:
> >
> > This uses the newly added ovsdb_idl_set_write_changed_only_all() to
> > explicitly disable atomicity checks for read/write columns and to enable
> > optimizing the process of building t
On Mon, May 16, 2022 at 4:51 AM Dumitru Ceara wrote:
>
> On 5/16/22 10:29, Lorenzo Bianconi wrote:
> >> On 5/3/22 21:09, Lorenzo Bianconi wrote:
> >>> Do not group lflows if the corresponding datapath does not run
> >>> copp meters and the previous one has an associated copp entry.
> >>> In order
ovn-controller does not see any noticeable
> performance decrease.
>
> If we can get confirmation, then I'll ack the series.
>
Thanks Mark for the reviews.
Sure. I'll do some tests and share the results.
Numan
>
> On 5/12/22 20:42, num...@ovn.org wrote:
> >
On Wed, May 4, 2022 at 5:35 AM Vladislav Odintsov wrote:
> Hi,
>
> this is a quick reminder.
> Thanks.
>
> Regards,
> Vladislav Odintsov
>
> > On 15 Apr 2022, at 11:46, Vladislav Odintsov wrote:
> >
> > Hi Numan, Ihar, Han, Mark,
> >
> > would somebody find some time to take a look on this pleas
On Tue, May 10, 2022 at 10:55 AM Mark Michelson wrote:
> Thanks Mohammad,
>
> Acked-by: Mark Michelson
>
Thanks.
I applied this patch to the main branch and backported to branch-22.03 and
branch-21.12.
Numan
>
> On 4/26/22 05:49, Mohammad Heib wrote:
> > currently, when a lport with a nonemp
On Mon, Oct 17, 2022 at 9:14 AM Adrian Moreno wrote:
>
> sample ovn action encodes into the OFPACT_SAMPLE ovs action.
>
> OVN action allows the following parameters:
>
> - obs_domain_id: 8-bit integer that identifies the sampling application.
> This value will be combined with the datapath's tun
On Mon, Oct 17, 2022 at 9:15 AM Adrian Moreno wrote:
>
> By default, traffic that doesn't match any configured flow will be dropped.
> But having that behavior implicit makes those drops more difficult to
> visualize.
>
> Make default drops explicit both as default logical flows and as default
> o
On Fri, Oct 28, 2022 at 11:36 AM Dumitru Ceara wrote:
>
> Hi Xavier,
>
> On 10/24/22 17:21, Xavier Simonart wrote:
> > In the following scenario:
> > - interface "old" is created and external_ids:iface-id is set (to lp)
> > - interface "new" is created and external_ids:iface-id is set (to same lp)
On Mon, Oct 24, 2022 at 6:47 AM Felix Hüttner via dev
wrote:
>
> We need to be able to handle rarp fields in order to ensure we can
> handle rarp messages we send ourselves.
> This will be used by the next patch in the series.
>
> Signed-off-by: Felix Huettner
Acked-by: Numa
hanges done, you can add my Acked-by tag in the next version
Acked-by: Numan Siddique
Numan
> ---
> northd/northd.c | 9 +
> northd/ovn_northd.dl | 2 +-
> tests/ovn-northd.at | 18 +-
> tests/ovn.at | 8 +++-
> 4 files changed, 22
On Mon, Oct 24, 2022 at 6:48 AM Felix Hüttner via dev
wrote:
>
> in order to easily add future ipv6 test cases the common `ovn_attach`
> function should also support ipv6 addresses.
>
> Signed-off-by: Felix Huettner
Acked-by: Numan Siddique
Numan
> ---
> tes
t;
> This change has been tested in an environment with 600 logical routers
> on a single ipv6 external network.
>
> Signed-off-by: Felix Huettner
Acked-by: Numan Siddique
Numan
> ---
> controller/pinctrl.c | 23 +
> tests/ovn.at | 80 +
On Mon, Oct 24, 2022 at 6:47 AM Felix Hüttner via dev
wrote:
>
> previously garps/rarps where only sent for "external" lsp's if these
> had an ipv4 address attached. For lsp's on gateway routers that do
> not have an ipv4 address assigned (e.g. if they are ipv6 only) no
> rarps were send out.
>
>
get_zone_num "$ct_zones" ls0-hv1)
> +port2_zone=$(get_zone_num "$ct_zones" ls0-hv2)
> +snat_zone=$(get_zone_num "$ct_zones" ${lr_uuid}_snat)
> +
> +check test "$snat_zone" -eq "$snat_req_zone"
> +check test "$port1_zone" -ne
On Wed, Nov 2, 2022 at 7:39 AM Xavier Simonart wrote:
>
> Hi Numan, Dumitru
>
> Thanks for looking at this patch and for your feedback.
>
>
> On Tue, Nov 1, 2022 at 10:41 PM Numan Siddique wrote:
>
> > On Fri, Oct 28, 2022 at 11:36 AM Dumitru Ceara wrote:
> &g
On Thu, Nov 3, 2022 at 7:10 AM Xavier Simonart wrote:
>
> On Wed, Nov 2, 2022 at 3:31 PM Dumitru Ceara wrote:
>
> > On 11/2/22 15:21, Numan Siddique wrote:
> > > On Wed, Nov 2, 2022 at 7:39 AM Xavier Simonart
> > wrote:
> > >>
> > >> Hi N
On Fri, Nov 4, 2022 at 5:00 AM Felix Hüttner via dev
wrote:
>
> previously garps/rarps where only sent for "external" lsp's if these
> had an ipv4 address attached. For lsp's on gateway routers that do
> not have an ipv4 address assigned (e.g. if they are ipv6 only) no
> rarps were send out.
>
> T
On Wed, Nov 9, 2022 at 4:11 PM Han Zhou wrote:
>
> On Tue, Nov 8, 2022 at 7:51 AM venu.iyer wrote:
> >
> > Currently, even stateless flows are subject to connection tracking when
> there are
> > LB rules (for DNAT). However, if a flow needs to be subjected to LB, then
> it shouldn't
> > be config
On Wed, Nov 9, 2022 at 4:15 PM Numan Siddique wrote:
>
> On Wed, Nov 9, 2022 at 4:11 PM Han Zhou wrote:
> >
> > On Tue, Nov 8, 2022 at 7:51 AM venu.iyer wrote:
> > >
> > > Currently, even stateless flows are subject to connection tracking when
> > th
501 - 600 of 1201 matches
Mail list logo
