Re: [ovs-discuss] Bonding slave disabled

One more observation is that if any of the interface link status is down, then the add-bond operation is showing the down interface as disabled and up interface as enabled with proper mac address. On Fri, Feb 10, 2017 at 1:25 PM, Neelakantam Gaddam wrote: > Hi all, > > I

Re: [ovs-discuss] [ovs-dev] ip route command not adding entry into ovs-appctl ovs/route/show

On Thu, Feb 9, 2017 at 10:30 AM, Srikanth Lingala wrote: > Hi, > I am using OVS 2.6.1 which is installed on aarch64 Ubuntu 14.04 node. > When I add a 'route' it is adding into linux routing table. But, when I > execute the command 'ovs-appctl ovs/route/show', that

Re: [ovs-discuss] custom field in OVS flow rules

To add support for a new field to the datapath, I'd look for another commit that does that and use it as a template. To make every packet go to userspace, the most general way is to make odp_flow_key_to_flow() return ODP_FIT_TOO_LITTLE for flows that should have the field. For example, if your

Re: [ovs-discuss] custom field in OVS flow rules

Dear Ben, Yes, done. Thx. Another question; it seems to be that only the first packet of the flow is appropriately matched through my user-space rule, while the rest are pretty much ignored. Is there any manual about extending the kernel datapath to appropriately cache my field? I think

Re: [ovs-discuss] Indirect Control Channel

On Thu, Feb 09, 2017 at 09:49:11AM -0700, Scott Lowe wrote: > Please see my reply below. > > > On 02/09/2017 08:36 AM, Jannis Ohms wrote: > > I would like to connect my Switches indirect with the controller. To > > achive this i would like to deploy 2 bridges on every switch one to > > provide

Re: [ovs-discuss] Indirect Control Channel

Please see my reply below. On 02/09/2017 08:36 AM, Jannis Ohms wrote: > I would like to connect my Switches indirect with the controller. To > achive this i would like to deploy 2 bridges on every switch one to > provide classical L2 forwarding for the controlchannel and one to use > with

[ovs-discuss] Indirect Control Channel

I would like to connect my Switches indirect with the controller. To achive this i would like to deploy 2 bridges on every switch one to provide classical L2 forwarding for the controlchannel and one to use with Openflow. Something like this

Re: [ovs-discuss] OVN how to support firewall or it's develop roadmap

On Thu, Feb 09, 2017 at 10:49:04PM +0800, multi_t...@163.com wrote: > 1. I need firewall function of OVN, what can i do ? OVN has a distributed firewall. What's wrong with it for your purpose? > 2. I wonder to know OVN's develop roadmap, where can I find it? You can find some items in

Re: [ovs-discuss] OVN how to support firewall or it's develop roadmap

On Thu, Feb 09, 2017 at 07:18:23PM +0800, 高正伟 wrote: > Hello, OVN support ACL rule to control logical port depend on > conntrack, I wonder to know that how to support firewall function from > router’s view, or please tell me it’s develop roadmap. Can you explain the question in more detail, or

Re: [ovs-discuss] how to tell devstack to run my openvswitch version

Thanks Ian, I don't see the OVS_GIT_REPO= OVS_GIT_TAG= in the local.conf in this link I see "enable_plugin networking-ovs-dpdk https://github.com/openstack/networking-ovs-dpdk master " Can I change this to my path ? how to be compatible with git clone command ? Regards avi >

[ovs-discuss] OVN how to support firewall or it's develop roadmap

Hello,OVN support ACL rule to control logical port depend on conntrack, I wonder to know that how to support firewall function from router’s view, or please tell me it’s develop roadmap. Best Regards Zhengwei Gao___ discuss mailing list

Re: [ovs-discuss] OVS Packet Per Second Performance

>-Original Message- >From: ovs-discuss-boun...@openvswitch.org [mailto:ovs-discuss- >boun...@openvswitch.org] On Behalf Of Kumuthini Ratnasingham >Sent: Thursday, February 9, 2017 12:14 AM >To: disc...@openvswitch.org >Subject: [ovs-discuss] OVS Packet Per Second Performance > >Hi there, >