That’s right; that is what I meant by “this is yet even further away from your
needs”
On 3/20/17, 11:50 PM, "Ali Volkan Atli" wrote:
I know ingress/egress policier but they cannot give me traffic
prioritization, right?
- Volkan
From: Darrell Ball
Date: Monday, March 20, 2017 at 10:12 PM
To: Advith Nagappa , Ben Pfaff
Cc: "disc...@openvswitch.org"
Subject: Re: [ovs-discuss] OVS-DPDK
From: on behalf of Advith Nagappa
Date: Monday, March 20, 2017 at 8:19 PM
To: Ben Pfaff
Cc: "disc...@openvswitch.org"
Subject: Re
I know ingress/egress policier but they cannot give me traffic prioritization,
right?
- Volkan
From: Darrell Ball [db...@vmware.com]
Sent: Tuesday, March 21, 2017 9:43 AM
To: Ali Volkan Atli; disc...@openvswitch.org
Subject: Re: [ovs-discuss] High Priori
For completeness
There is also ingress side policing for DPDK support, but this is yet even
further away from your needs
On 3/20/17, 11:08 PM, "ovs-discuss-boun...@openvswitch.org on behalf of Darrell
Ball" wrote:
Afaik
OVS-DPDK only supports egress-policing qos
https://urldefense
Afaik
OVS-DPDK only supports egress-policing qos
http://openvswitch.org/support/dist-docs/ovs-vswitchd.conf.db.5.pdf
see egress--policer
On 3/20/17, 10:30 PM, "ovs-discuss-boun...@openvswitch.org on behalf of Ali
Volkan Atli" wrote:
Hi all
I need to specify a number of classes
Hi all
I need to specify a number of classes of service according to DSCP bits. Each
class of service should be associated with a priority. For example: Packet A is
sent with a DSCP value of 0 and packet B is sent with a value of 46; 0 has a
lower priority than 46. Packet A arrives before pack
It did not tell me anything:
*Mar 20 11:42:23 ovs-vsctl: ovs|1|vsctl|INFO|Called as ovs-vsctl
add-port br0 dpdk-p0 -- set Interface dpdk-p0 type=dpdk
options:dpdk-devargs=:00:0a.0*
*Mar 20 11:42:23 ovs-vswitchd[23906]: ovs|00042|bridge|WARN|could not open
network device dpdk-p0 (No such
On Tue, Mar 21, 2017 at 02:36:23AM +0100, Advith Nagappa wrote:
> Hi,
>
> I have DPDK 16.11.1 and OVS 2.6.1, with 1 Gb Huge page/ and 2 NICs bound
> with Igb_uio drivers.
>
> I run in to trouble while creating DPDK ports on the OVS bridge.
>
>
> *ovs-vsctl add-port br0 dpdk-p1 -- set Interface
Hi,
I have DPDK 16.11.1 and OVS 2.6.1, with 1 Gb Huge page/ and 2 NICs bound
with Igb_uio drivers.
I run in to trouble while creating DPDK ports on the OVS bridge.
*ovs-vsctl add-port br0 dpdk-p1 -- set Interface dpdk-p1 type=dpdk*
works perfectly fine.
But,
*ovs-vsctl add-port br0 dpdk-p0 -
Yes, thanks for your report. I try to find what might cause this.
Thanks.
Nick
> On Mar 21, 2017, at 7:12 AM, Joe Stringer wrote:
>
> Hi Nick,
>
> Looks like there's another report of trouble with this test below.
> Would you be able to take a look?
___
This is good information to have. Thanks Tony and Stephen.
I didn't know that Open Switch used anything from OVS other than
ovsdb-server. Maybe I'll have a look sometime.
On Tue, Mar 21, 2017 at 12:21:37PM +1300, Tony van der Peet wrote:
> We use a dpif implementation (based very much on dpif-n
We use a dpif implementation (based very much on dpif-netdev) but have
also strongly considered writing our own ofproto. So I would agree
that keeping the ofproto layer would be a good thing. And keeping it
in such a way as to make it possible to write a new one!
OpenSwitch is one project that hav
Hi Nick,
Looks like there's another report of trouble with this test below.
Would you be able to take a look?
On 20 March 2017 at 07:44, Aynur Shakirov wrote:
> For latest master the OVS build of deb package unsuccessfully ends because
> test "flush the fdb and mdb when topology changed" is fail
There are recordings of presentations about OVS performance at the OVS
conference web page.
For example: openvswitch.org/support/ovscon2015/17/1050-abidi.pptx
- Vasmi
From: ovs-discuss-boun...@openvswitch.org
on behalf of Danish Sattar
Sent: Monday, March
We are playing with OVS/DPDK and have noticed that STT does not seem to be
supported in userspace. Wondering if anyone happens to be working on
implementing this or has any suggestions for making it work
Testing on OVS 2.7.9 and DPDK 16.11
thanks
Luca.
__
Hi everyone,
I'm doing benchmark for the OVS kernel datapath module. i'm trying to see
the effect of different packet sizes, data rates and hardware on the
performance. i'm wondering if there are similar benchmarks available or if
any relevant information is available.
Thanks
*Best Regards*
*Dani
For latest master the OVS build of deb package unsuccessfully ends
because test "flush the fdb and mdb when topology changed" is fail. Test
added to git in commit 427e9751f30067357262f58fdf5af55df4b6debf
Env: Ubuntu 16.04.1 with latest updates, compiler is gcc 5.3.1, dpdk
enabled.
Log: http:
Hi everyone,
Using in-band control, I've observed by Wireshark that the OFPT_HELLO
packet is captured
on one interface(ethX added to OVS bridge). Originally, I thought that all
of the ports of the
bridge direct the control traffic. The reason is that in in-band.c, the
hidden flow only specify
the
Hello,
I'm running ovs-dpdk with vxlan tunnel
Setup like http://docs.openvswitch.org/en/latest/howto/userspace-tunneling/
I'm running iperf3 on the endpoints VMs - and I see incorrect TCP checksum at
the server side (this is seen after vxlan decap) I don't think this is ovs-dpdk
issue - since th
Hi,
I'd like to forward BPDUs transparently in the OVS environment.
Would it be possible to let the OVS Bridge do not process RSTP fames and
instead treat them as special traffic and mark them with special VLAN in order
to let the internal VM Linux bridges run RSTP (BPDU tunneling).
another
20 matches
Mail list logo
