both are ok , In facts , I prefer to disable the logging of controller.
On 6/20 10:50, Ben Pfaff wrote:
On June 20, 2017 10:36:17 AM GMT+08:00, Margin Hu wrote:
yes , how to do ?
On 6/20 10:28, Ben Pfaff wrote:
Do you want to disable the logging or the controller? On Tue,
On June 20, 2017 10:36:17 AM GMT+08:00, Margin Hu wrote:
>yes , how to do ?
>
>
>On 6/20 10:28, Ben Pfaff wrote:
>> Do you want to disable the logging or the controller?
>>
>> On Tue, Jun 20, 2017 at 10:23:39AM +0800, Margin Hu wrote:
>>> thanks , you're right , I can capture the changement as fo
yes , how to do ?
On 6/20 10:28, Ben Pfaff wrote:
Do you want to disable the logging or the controller?
On Tue, Jun 20, 2017 at 10:23:39AM +0800, Margin Hu wrote:
thanks , you're right , I can capture the changement as following:
340483:2017-06-20T02:17:20.825Z|62030|vconn|DBG|unix: receive
Do you want to disable the logging or the controller?
On Tue, Jun 20, 2017 at 10:23:39AM +0800, Margin Hu wrote:
> thanks , you're right , I can capture the changement as following:
>
> 340483:2017-06-20T02:17:20.825Z|62030|vconn|DBG|unix: received:
> OFPT_FLOW_MOD (xid=0x2): ADD actions=NORMAL
thanks , you're right , I can capture the changement as following:
340483:2017-06-20T02:17:20.825Z|62030|vconn|DBG|unix: received:
OFPT_FLOW_MOD (xid=0x2): ADD actions=NORMAL
340486:2017-06-20T02:17:20.825Z|62033|connmgr|INFO|provision<->unix: 1
flow_mods in the last 0 s (1 adds)
341089:2017-0
On Tue, Jun 20, 2017 at 08:49:23AM +0800, Margin Hu wrote:
> My openvswitch version is openvswitch-2.6.1-4.1.git20161206.el7.x86_64 ,
>
> can you appoint out set which module for my target ?
>
> [root@cloud-sz-master-b12-02 ~]# ovs-appctl vlog/list
I suggest "ovs-appctl vlog/set vconn".
___
My openvswitch version is openvswitch-2.6.1-4.1.git20161206.el7.x86_64 ,
can you appoint out set which module for my target ?
[root@cloud-sz-master-b12-02 ~]# ovs-appctl vlog/list
consolesyslogfile
-------
backtrace EMER
Yes. UDP works well . We send udp packets with length 1024 (less then mtu) ,
then work very good .
But tcp work very bad , we think tcp works badly because it needs to be
retransmitted . That could be a general case.
We can communicate with each other on these implementations._
On Tue, Jun 20, 2017 at 06:22:00AM +0800, Margin Hu wrote:
> I found flow rule entry in flow table is dropped by unknow cause, you can
> review detail issue at
>
> https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/1697243
>
> now, how can I set debug log level ?
You can use ovs-appctl to set the log levels f
Hi everyone,
I noticed a strange behavior of group reference count in ovs 2.7.0 and
therefore I am writing to confirm if this is expected.
I created 2 indirect groups and 1 select group. There are 2 buckets in the
select group, each of them points to one of the indirect group.
sudo ovs-ofctl -O O
On Mon, Jun 19, 2017 at 03:11:23PM -0700, Joe Stringer wrote:
> On 19 June 2017 at 14:08, Keith Holleman via discuss
> wrote:
> >
> > Went to add a match rule based on packet length and couldn't find the right
> > term or syntax. Then I searched the ovs-ofctl man page and couldn't find
> > anythi
Hi Guys:
I found flow rule entry in flow table is dropped by unknow cause, you
can review detail issue at
https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/1697243
now, how can I set debug log level ?
--
-
Margin Hu
Love open source software
mail: jhu_...@1
On 19 June 2017 at 14:08, Keith Holleman via discuss
wrote:
>
> Went to add a match rule based on packet length and couldn't find the right
> term or syntax. Then I searched the ovs-ofctl man page and couldn't find
> anything. Even more surprising was that I couldn't find an example of this
> pr
On 19 June 2017 at 00:37, Numan Siddique wrote:
>
>
> On Fri, Jun 16, 2017 at 11:22 PM, Joe Stringer wrote:
>>
>> On 15 June 2017 at 22:20, Numan Siddique wrote:
>> >
>> >
>> > On Thu, Jun 15, 2017 at 5:06 PM, Aswin S wrote:
>> >>
>> >>
>> >> Adding some more info here, Thanks Numan! for pointi
Went to add a match rule based on packet length and couldn't find the right
term or syntax. Then I searched the ovs-ofctl man page and couldn't find
anything. Even more surprising was that I couldn't find an example of this
previously being asked on any OVS discussion groups. Couldn't find it i
On Mon, Jun 19, 2017 at 1:58 AM, 爬山虎 wrote:
>
> 1)We think one meter with one bond is just good way , one meter with
> multiple band can not be work (can not be test in real project). So sorry
> we never to realize multiple band that wrong in theory.
I don't think OVS can benefit from such rest
>From my understanding, conntrack mark and label are metadata that are
associated with a flow. They are maintained in ovs internally, but not
in the packet's wire format. You can find more information on
ovs-fields (7) or on ./include/openvswitch/flow.h (struct flow).
-Yi-Hung
On Sun, Jun 18, 201
Not solved - the tap device is linkdown
> -Original Message-
> From: Avi Cohen (A)
> Sent: Monday, 19 June, 2017 3:09 PM
> To: 'ovs-discuss@openvswitch.org'; 'us...@dpdk.org'
> Subject: RE: OVS-DPDK - af_packet vdev configuration - Error
>
> OK - solved
> The problem was with the device
OK - solved
The problem was with the device MTU which is set in the af_packet to 1518,
In my port creation I set its MTU to 9000
I've changed the MTU in the af_packet driver to 9000
> -Original Message-
> From: Avi Cohen (A)
> Sent: Sunday, 18 June, 2017 5:45 PM
> To: 'ovs-discuss@openvs
1)We think one meter with one bond is just good way , one meter with multiple
band can not be work (can not be test in real project). So sorry we never to
realize multiple band that wrong in theory.
2) This days we are realizing the meter function with netlink style . We just
put the meter a
hi, santhosh
I'm glad to see that, I have had this problem recently.
How do you deal with this? ovs full offload or ovs dataplane offload?
Anybody have any experience with ovs offload?
===
On Fri, Jun 16, 2017 at 11:22 PM, Joe Stringer wrote:
> On 15 June 2017 at 22:20, Numan Siddique wrote:
> >
> >
> > On Thu, Jun 15, 2017 at 5:06 PM, Aswin S wrote:
> >>
> >>
> >> Adding some more info here, Thanks Numan! for pointing to this.
> >>
> >> The issue I am facing looks similar to the
22 matches
Mail list logo
