Hi Guys,
Now I met an issue about neutron and openvswitch, how to understand
ofctl request msg like as following ?
2017-06-23 06:21:12.783 7 DEBUG
neutron.plugins.ml2.drivers.openvswitch.agent.openflow.native.ofswitch
[req-381c7dde-6c3d-4e3b-af32-ae20c75f59d9 - - - - -] ofctl request
vers
Hi,
I have used OVS for L3 forwarding from A to C through B(OVS).
I have wanted to achieve higher performance of OVS and found that OVS
attempts to receive batch of packets from 'rx'.
However I couldn't find 'TX batch of packet'.
doesn't OVS support TX batch?
Please let me know if you have an
Thanks Darrell,
More questions:
Why not allocating 64k for each dpcls? does the 64k just fit in L3 cache or
anywhere? how it is calculated in such an exact number? If there are more
ports added for polling, for avoid competing can I increase the 64k size
into a bigger one? Thanks.
Hui.
_
Thanks Darrell.
I just want to confirm whether static link of dpdk library is supported or not
for rpm build. From below discuss, it seems only dynamic link is supported.
https://mail.openvswitch.org/pipermail/ovs-dev/2015-November/306324.html
@Flavio,
Appreciate your idea.
Br,
Wang Zhike
-
On Thu, Jun 22, 2017 at 01:48:23PM +0800, Margin Hu wrote:
> [root@cloud ]# ovs-vsctl del-port provision bond0
> [root@cloud]# ovs-vsctl add-port provision bond0
> ovs-vsctl: Error detected while setting up 'bond0'. See ovs-vswitchd log
> for details.
>
> ovs-vswitchd.log
>
> 1581163:2017-06-22T
Usually this means that some error prevented ovs-vswitchd from actually
creating what the database configured. It can also mean that
ovs-vswitchd is not running. Check the ovs-vswitchd log for more
information.
On Thu, Jun 22, 2017 at 09:58:32AM +, Ali Volkan Atli wrote:
>
> Hi all
>
> I m
On Jun 23, 2017 1:31 AM, "Joe Stringer" wrote:
On 22 June 2017 at 04:16, Numan Siddique wrote:
>
>
> On Thu, Jun 22, 2017 at 5:45 AM, Joe Stringer wrote:
>>
>> On 21 June 2017 at 04:19, Numan Siddique wrote:
>> >
>> >
>> > On Tue, Jun 20, 2017 at 3:11 AM, Joe Stringer wrote:
>> >>
>> >> On 19
On 22 June 2017 at 14:15, sougol gheissi wrote:
> Hello,
> In another conference the Qosmos company claimed to process the packet for
> DPI purpose, without adding any patch and just using conntrack, but the
> question is how to do this, if it doesn't uses nfqueue?! :-?
> Thanks.
Please don't dr
On 22 June 2017 at 04:16, Numan Siddique wrote:
>
>
> On Thu, Jun 22, 2017 at 5:45 AM, Joe Stringer wrote:
>>
>> On 21 June 2017 at 04:19, Numan Siddique wrote:
>> >
>> >
>> > On Tue, Jun 20, 2017 at 3:11 AM, Joe Stringer wrote:
>> >>
>> >> On 19 June 2017 at 00:37, Numan Siddique wrote:
>> >>
On 21 June 2017 at 21:51, Deepak S wrote:
> Hello,
>
>
> Does OVS support Nfqueue? I'm using version 2.7.0 and I did quite a bit of
> search and didn't find any nfqueue related actions.
Not at this stage.
___
discuss mailing list
disc...@openvswitch.org
From: on behalf of Hui Xiang
Date: Thursday, June 22, 2017 at 2:22 AM
To: "ovs-discuss@openvswitch.org"
Subject: Re: [ovs-discuss] max mega flow 64k per pmd or per dpcls?
Anyone could help to answer it?
On Tue, Jun 20, 2017 at 6:22 PM, Hui Xiang
mailto:xiangh...@gmail.com>> wrote:
Hello gu
This may not be the best list to help here.
Maybe a Centos mailing list, possibly or one of the gnu mailing lists.
Some information that may be useful for your email to one
of these lists:
What version of glibc are you using
rpm -q glibc
in your case
What version of libtool
libtool --version
W
On Thu, Jun 22, 2017 at 5:45 AM, Joe Stringer wrote:
> On 21 June 2017 at 04:19, Numan Siddique wrote:
> >
> >
> > On Tue, Jun 20, 2017 at 3:11 AM, Joe Stringer wrote:
> >>
> >> On 19 June 2017 at 00:37, Numan Siddique wrote:
> >> >
> >> >
> >> > On Fri, Jun 16, 2017 at 11:22 PM, Joe Stringer
Hi all
I met an issue about devstack with openvswitch using ./stack.sh script. In the
log below, it says br-ex and br-int is not a bridge but when I check ovs-vsctl,
the bridges are exist. How can this happen?
Thanks in advance
- Volkan
./stack.sh log
2017-06-22 09:20:26.795 | + ./s
Anyone could help to answer it?
On Tue, Jun 20, 2017 at 6:22 PM, Hui Xiang wrote:
> Hello guys,
>
> I have seen that there will be one dpcls instance for each port per pmd,
> and seems flow table max entries num is 64k per pmd other than per dpcls,
> my question is if there are several dpcls i
On 23/12/16 16:50, Ben Pfaff wrote:
>>
>> Hi,
>>
>> I second that. It would be really helpful to have the old links redirect
>> to the new ones.
>
> Justin, do you know who would have to implement this? Is it one of us,
> or do we need to ask Linux Foundation to help?
>
> Thanks,
>
> Ben.
>
H
Hi,
I saw below output when executing the rpmbuild. I guess it is the root cause,
since it refuses to link static lib.
checking if gcc -std=gnu99 static flag -static works... no
I tested that if I compile the dpdk to shared library, then the ovs rpmbuild
will succeed.
However, even if I inst
17 matches
Mail list logo
