Hi,
Currently in OvS if we hit "Table-miss" rules (associated with Controller
action) then we send
PACKET_IN message to controller with reason as OFPR_NO_MATCH.
“Table-miss” rule is one whose priority is 0 and its catch all rule.
But if we hit same "Table-miss" rule after executing group entry
On 4/23/18, 6:53 PM, "Carlos Ferreira" wrote:
@IWAMOTO
Hello IWAMOTO,
No, I do not get any kind of error from Ryu. I have also verified the
structure of the Openflow messages sent to the switch using Wireshark
and no anomalies were found. The
One question, why now ovs can only set the mac of internal interface,
for example:
ovs-vsctl set Interface p1 type=internal mac=\"00:11:22:33:44:55\"
ovs-vsctl get Interface p1 mac_in_use
And the doc about 'mac' is not explained, why we cannot set it for
other type interface. So it's a bug?
//You can verify that OVS supports deletion by cookie specification by checking
these tests:
932: ofproto.at:1746ofproto - del flows based on cookie
933: ofproto.at:1767ofproto - del flows based on cookie mask
// Run the tests using “make check” like this:
sudo make check
On Mon, Apr 23, 2018 at 12:21 AM, Wei Li wrote:
>
> Hi Han,
>
>
> On 04/19/2018 06:07 AM, Han Zhou wrote:
> > On Wed, Apr 18, 2018 at 1:41 PM, Mike Spreitzer
wrote:
> >> How big a system can OVN manage? I am told some local experimenters
did
> >> some
I modified ofproto.c "handle_flow_stats_request" function. I added a
while loop to check the flow table every 2 seconds.
I want to ask "handle_openflow_" can handle other request, like packet -
in?
___
discuss mailing list
disc...@openvswitch.org
Hi Ian and everyone,
Thank you for clarifying, i was just trying to understand :)
my bad about the 1 queue, though, i changed it to two queues and still the
performance was poor around 60mpps.
My findings are:
1. changed the PMD to a core where no other services were running.
2. added many