Ju
On Tue, 8 May 2018, 17:31 , wrote:
> Send discuss mailing list submissions to
> ovs-discuss@openvswitch.org
>
> To subscribe or unsubscribe via the World Wide Web, visit
> https://mail.openvswitch.org/mailman/listinfo/ovs-discuss
> or, via email, send a message with subject or
Hi!
I consider this as bug as it it makes spanning tree debugging quite complicated.
Problem: It is not possible to retrieve the current path costs (default value
or manually configured) of a Port.
There is information available with:
vs-vsctl get Port $i rstp_status, eg:
{rstp_designated_bridg
Hi
Is it expected to discard validation port handling? I am seeing a
build up of validation ports over a long period of time.
Can somebody give understanding how validation ports handling
work here with respect to openvswitch?
Thanks
Vamsi
___
On Tue, May 08, 2018 at 09:51:14AM +, Klaus Darilion wrote:
> Hi!
>
> I consider this as bug as it it makes spanning tree debugging quite
> complicated.
>
> Problem: It is not possible to retrieve the current path costs (default value
> or manually configured) of a Port.
>
> There is infor
On Tue, May 08, 2018 at 01:49:47PM +, Vamsimohan Kommana -X (vakomman -
WIPRO LIMITED at Cisco) wrote:
> Is it expected to discard validation port handling? I am seeing
> a build up of validation ports over a long period of time.
>
> Can somebody give understandin
On Mon, May 07, 2018 at 02:30:26PM -0700, dikiciber...@gmail.com wrote:
> I have a problem with the fast failover group. For further details please
> see ONOS-Discuss
> (https://groups.google.com/a/onosproject.org/forum/#!msg/onos-discuss/hkKABMjByAY/-vCWwNYdAgAJ)
> On Tuesday, May 1, 2018 at 9:4
Hi Ben!
> > There is the field "rstp_designated_path_cost", but this is the total
> path costs from the port to the root bridge WITHOUT the Port's own path
> cost. Hence a field "rstp-path-cost" would be needed in the rstp_status
> output to support tree debugging.
>
> It seems like a reasonable
Please don't drop the mailing list.
One oddity in the output you showed is that each bucket lists its own
group as watch_group. This seems wrong. What is the purpose? But I
don't see an actual problem with it.
I suggest trying to use ofproto/trace to trace an appropriate packet
through the gro
Hi,
I am trying to find the OvS benchmark on embedded ARM. Trying to get more
details on below items...
-Slow path PPS(i.e flow setup rate) it can handle
-Per flow memory used by the vswitchd.
Can someone point me where I can get OvS benchmark information especially for
embedde
On Mon, May 07, 2018 at 03:46:11PM +0200, Natanael Copa wrote:
> I have attached tests/testsuite.log
>
>
> musl libc (x86_64)
> Version 1.1.19
> Dynamic Program Loader
> Usage: /lib/ld-musl-x86_64.so.1 [options] [--] pathname [args]
> ## - ##
> ## openvswitch 2.9.0 tes
Hi Babu/Numan,
I have a question regarding OVN pacemaker OCF script.
I see in the script MASTER_IP is used to start the active DB and standby
DBs will use that IP to sync from.
In the Documentation/topics/integration.rst it is also mentioned:
`master_ip` is the IP address on which the active dat
11 matches
Mail list logo
