On Wed, Mar 6, 2019 at 7:01 PM Oleg Bondarev wrote:
>
> I'm thinking if this can be malloc() not returning memory to the system
> after peak loads:
> *"Occasionally, free can actually return memory to the operating system
> and make the process smaller. Usually, all it can do is allow a later cal
On Wed, Mar 6, 2019 at 9:06 AM Ben Pfaff wrote:
>
> On Tue, Mar 05, 2019 at 09:39:37PM -0800, Han Zhou wrote:
> > On Tue, Mar 5, 2019 at 7:24 PM Ben Pfaff wrote:
> > > What's the effective difference between an OVN deployment with 3 zones,
> > > and a collection of 3 OVN deployments? Is it simpl
Thanks, I applied this.
I see a lot more test failures with a modified hash function. James,
I'm surprised that you only see one failure on big-endian.
On Wed, Mar 06, 2019 at 09:35:03AM -0500, Mark Michelson wrote:
> https://patchwork.ozlabs.org/patch/1052369/
>
> On 3/6/19 8:59 AM, Mark Miche
I want to attach two VMs to OVS using libvrt. I am following these steps:
http://docs.openvswitch.org/en/latest/howto/libvirt/
I have OVS with DPDK configuration running. I have created br0 bridge
without mentioned datapath_type=netdev, i.e. I do not want to use DPDJ=K
datapath for this testing th
On Tue, Mar 05, 2019 at 09:39:37PM -0800, Han Zhou wrote:
> On Tue, Mar 5, 2019 at 7:24 PM Ben Pfaff wrote:
> > What's the effective difference between an OVN deployment with 3 zones,
> > and a collection of 3 OVN deployments? Is it simply that the 3-zone
> > deployment shares databases? Is that
I'm thinking if this can be malloc() not returning memory to the system
after peak loads:
*"Occasionally, free can actually return memory to the operating system and
make the process smaller. Usually, all it can do is allow a later call to
malloc to reuse the space. In the meantime, the space remai
https://patchwork.ozlabs.org/patch/1052369/
On 3/6/19 8:59 AM, Mark Michelson wrote:
OK, I think I see what the problem is now.
The issue is with the order that ovn_ports are visited in
join_logical_ports. If a logical switch port is connected to a logical
router port, then if the logical swi
OK, I think I see what the problem is now.
The issue is with the order that ovn_ports are visited in
join_logical_ports. If a logical switch port is connected to a logical
router port, then if the logical switch port is visited first,
everything works fine. If the logical router port is visite
Hi Ben,
Thanks for reaching out. Right now it's not obvious why big endian
architecture would cause duplicate IPs to be assigned. My initial
thought was that the wrong byte ordering was being used when adding IP
addresses to IPAM, but it appears that host byte ordering is being used
consisten
Thanks Dan for chiming in and others as well for your feedback!
I also thought of having separate OVN deployments but that introduces
the drawbacks that Han pointed out adding - maybe a lot of - burden to
the CMS. Separate zones in the same OVN deployment will add minimal
changes (at deployment si
On Tue, Mar 5, 2019 at 9:40 PM Han Zhou wrote:
> On Tue, Mar 5, 2019 at 7:24 PM Ben Pfaff wrote:
> > What's the effective difference between an OVN deployment with 3 zones,
> > and a collection of 3 OVN deployments? Is it simply that the 3-zone
> > deployment shares databases? Is that a signif
Hello,
The musl-if_packet.patch will always be needed by Alpine due to musl
libc / glibc incompatibilities.
See: https://wiki.musl-libc.org/faq.html#Q:-Why-am-I-getting-
Kind Regards,
Stuart Cardall.
On 2019-03-06 02:01, Ben Pfaff wrote:
Hmm, with the patch I suspect that compilation fai
12 matches
Mail list logo
