On 6/18/2019 1:22 AM, Gregory Rose wrote:
>
> On 6/12/2019 2:20 AM, Eli Britstein wrote:
>> Could you please have a look (and even better try?) still need to
>> tidy up
>>
>> https://eur03.safelinks.protection.outlook.com/?url=https%3A%2F%2Fgithub.com%2Felibr-mellanox%2Flinux%2Ftree%2Fovs-ipv6-gr
Minor update:
Iperf was using different source port when re-initiated, so this is why
it became again part of fast path.
If I send packets that matches the allow rule and all header fields are
the same, then it won't be cached again once it has been deleted.
On Tue, 2019-06-18 at 10:38 +0800, Le
Hi fellow OVS users and gurus,
I am playing with ovs-dpctl del-flow command to manually remove entries
from the cache.
I have a following entry in the cache which let's incoming traffic to a
destination IP with udp port 80 to a service:
recirc_id(0),in_port(4),eth(),eth_type(0x0800),ipv4(dst=10.
On 6/12/2019 2:20 AM, Eli Britstein wrote:
Could you please have a look (and even better try?) still need to tidy up
https://github.com/elibr-mellanox/linux/tree/ovs-ipv6-gre
Hi Eli,
I finally managed to getting around and building your kernel. At least
it does do away with the protocol
Hi:
I'm testing ovs-dpdk on Intel 82599. I have a problem about mutilque. The
dpdk bind one vf with two queues, The VM config 8 queue. I find only two queue
is working in VM.
So,I check the code , I find when vm queue is bigger than dpdk queue, the
OVS will use the "static_tx_qid". I wan
Hi:
I'm testing ovs-dpdk on Intel 82599. I have a problem about mutilque. The
dpdk bind one vf with two queues, The VM config 8 queue. I find only two queue
is working in VM.
So,I check the code , I find when vm queue is bigger than dpdk queue, the
OVS will use the "static_tx_qid". I
