Hi Yi:
Thanks for your reply.
Another question: I have found for OVS master version there are many
modifications for compatible with DPDK-19.11, so if I want ovs master version
works with DPDK-18.11-6，I have to collect all the related patches and try to
revert them. Is there an easy ap
No, only one choice is to use the old ovs version.
-邮件原件-
发件人: txfh2007 [mailto:txfh2...@aliyun.com]
发送时间: 2020年2月26日 17:13
收件人: Yi Yang (杨燚)-云服务集团 ; ovs-discuss
主题: Re：[ovs-discuss] Question about DPDK version which OVS works with
Hi Yi:
Thanks for your reply.
Another questi
Answer inline and provided other config related information below. Let me
know in case you need any other information.
*eth1 is it the port representor of VF1?*
eth0 and eth1 are port representor for VF1 and VF2 respectively.
*eth0 is the up-link representor?*
ens11 is pf(uplink) interface.
*C
Hi satish,
I think the problem is in the rules of the form
recirc_id(0),in_port(2),eth(src=e4:11:22:33:44:50,dst=ff:ff:ff:ff:ff:ff),eth_type(0x0800),ipv4(frag=no),
packets:195, bytes:66690, used:3.722s, actions:1,3,4
Any idea why all ipv4 rules has broadcast mac address? and flooded to all ports
