Re: [ovs-discuss] Null pointer when allocating OVS flow in ovs_packet_cmd_execute

On Fri, May 29, 2020 at 8:04 AM Aaron Conole wrote: > Daryl Wang via discuss writes: > > > We noticed that an OVS datapath stopped responding to stats request. On > checking dmesg, we found that OVS > > ran into a null pointer in ovs_flow_alloc while in > ovs_packet_cmd_execute. Is this a known

Re: [ovs-discuss] [TC] Request for changes to netlink message population for OVS-TC Flower Offload

This seems like something for Simon to look at. On Fri, May 29, 2020 at 04:56:11PM +0530, K Chandra wrote: > OVS-TC offload sends only fields that are not completely masked out to the > TC kernel module. Some of the hardware we work with requires all fields > extracted from the packet along with t

Re: [ovs-discuss] Null pointer when allocating OVS flow in ovs_packet_cmd_execute

Daryl Wang via discuss writes: > We noticed that an OVS datapath stopped responding to stats request. On > checking dmesg, we found that OVS > ran into a null pointer in ovs_flow_alloc while in ovs_packet_cmd_execute. Is > this a known bug? Not as far as I am aware. > We have not seen the fai

Re: [ovs-discuss] check_pkt_larger precision

On 5/29/20 12:51 PM, Numan Siddique wrote: > > > On Fri, May 29, 2020 at 3:41 PM Miroslav Kubiczek > > wrote: > > > On 29. 05. 20 11:29, Numan Siddique wrote: >> On Fri, May 29, 2020 at 2:25 PM Miroslav Kubiczek >> >

[ovs-discuss] [TC] Request for changes to netlink message population for OVS-TC Flower Offload

OVS-TC offload sends only fields that are not completely masked out to the TC kernel module. Some of the hardware we work with requires all fields extracted from the packet along with the mask to be sent to the driver. Hardware may optimise tables based on entire fields of packet and mask of field,

Re: [ovs-discuss] check_pkt_larger precision

On Fri, May 29, 2020 at 3:41 PM Miroslav Kubiczek < miroslav.kubic...@adaptivemobile.com> wrote: > > On 29. 05. 20 11:29, Numan Siddique wrote: > > On Fri, May 29, 2020 at 2:25 PM Miroslav Kubiczek < > miroslav.kubic...@adaptivemobile.com> wrote: > >> Hi, >> >> I have finally implemented flows wit

Re: [ovs-discuss] check_pkt_larger precision

On 29. 05. 20 11:29, Numan Siddique wrote: On Fri, May 29, 2020 at 2:25 PM Miroslav Kubiczek > wrote: Hi, I have finally implemented flows with check_pkt_larger action. Partial flow dump is here:table=0, priority=100 actions=check_pkt_la

Re: [ovs-discuss] check_pkt_larger precision

On Fri, May 29, 2020 at 2:25 PM Miroslav Kubiczek < miroslav.kubic...@adaptivemobile.com> wrote: > Hi, > > I have finally implemented flows with check_pkt_larger action. Partial flow > dump is here: > > table=0, priority=100 > actions=check_pkt_larger(60)->NXM_NX_REG0[0],resubmit(,1) > table=1,

[ovs-discuss] check_pkt_larger precision

Hi, I have finally implemented flows with check_pkt_larger action. Partial flow dump is here:table=0, priority=100 actions=check_pkt_larger(60)->NXM_NX_REG0[0],resubmit(,1) table=1, priority=1000,reg0=0x1 actions=resubmit(,2) table=1, priority=100,reg0=0 actions=resubmit(,3) I run a test which

Re: [ovs-discuss] DNS support in OVN

Hi, It works for me. Please below few comments. On Fri, May 29, 2020 at 4:45 AM John Lang wrote: > I’m trying to setup a OVN to experiment with the DNS support that is > include. I created a Logical Switch and a DNS record using “ovn-nbctl > create DNS records” to create some mappings. I poi