On Thu, Jan 21, 2021 at 8:13 AM Matthias Waehlisch
wrote:
>
>
> ... i was able to change the configuration using "ovs-vsctl set port
> xyz vlan_mode=native-untagged" but the virtual switch still sends
> packets that include a vlan tag on the access port instead of removing
> the tag. this is quite
Hi Numan,
you're right, I upgraded to ussuri and now I see the commands, however in
the second site, which is an openstack cell, I don't see the bd, I only see
an ovn-controller and ovn-metadata running on compute nodes.
My understanding is that BD is on the central site only, and cell is
connect
On Wed, Jan 20, 2021 at 05:25:49PM +0100, Matthias Waehlisch wrote:
> Hi,
>
> i'm wondering how to change the VLAN setting of an access-port
> without deleting the port.
>
> when i already added a port to a switch (ovs-vsctl add-port ...), and
> and want to change the VLAN setting via "ovs-
Hi,
TL;DR: I am wondering if there's any specific action/convention that needs
to be defined for groups which are referenced by a watch_group, as to have
the liveness check correctly working? FYI: I can't use a liveness check on
a dedicated OVS port in this case.
I have not been able to find much
On Thu, Jan 21, 2021 at 08:20:16PM +0100, Alexander Constantinescu wrote:
> Hi,
>
> TL;DR: I am wondering if there's any specific action/convention that needs
> to be defined for groups which are referenced by a watch_group, as to have
> the liveness check correctly working? FYI: I can't use a liv
On Thu, Jan 21, 2021 at 08:20:16PM +0100, Alexander Constantinescu wrote:
> I have not been able to find much documentation surrounding watch_group,
> the only doc I've been basing myself on is:
> http://www.openvswitch.org/support/dist-docs/ovs-ofctl.8.html
OVS follows the OpenFlow standard here,
OK, I figured out the problem.
Property 10, OFPTFPT_WILDCARDS, is missing. OF1.3 section 7.3.5.5.2
says that it's mandatory: "If a specific property does not have any
capability (for example no Set-Field support), a property with an empty
list must be included in the property list." I think that
Thanks for helping me.
I find the section in OF1.3.2 spec, and re-check with pcap file as you said.
I think I was missed the important message: "table features message missing
required property",
but only focus on "received bad reply: (***only uses 512 bytes out of
7056***)".
Thanks.
best wishes
Oh, I see. I'm glad I was able to help.
On Fri, Jan 22, 2021 at 10:21:21AM +0800, Dickens Yeh wrote:
> Thanks for helping me.
>
> I find the section in OF1.3.2 spec, and re-check with pcap file as you said.
> I think I was missed the important message: "table features message missing
> required
