Re: [ovs-discuss] OVN /OVS openvswitch: ovs-system: deferred action limit reached, drop recirc action

2021-08-04 Thread Krzysztof Klimonda
Hi Ammad, (Re-adding ovs-discuss@openvswitch.org to CC to keep track of the discussion) Thanks for testing it with SNAT enabled/disabled and verifying that it seems to be related. As for the impact of this bug I have to say I'm unsure. I have theorized that this could the cause for (or at leas

[ovs-discuss] ovsdb relay server segment fault

2021-08-04 Thread 贾文涛
ovn scale test, 3 clustered sb, 10 sb relay server, 1000 sandbox。 sb relay sever will be segment fault accidentally [root@node-4 ~]# kubectl logs -n openstack ovn-ovsdb-sb-relay-79d5dd7ff4-tqbbd --tail 10 -p 22021-08-01T03:09:44Z|15758|poll_loop|INFO|wakeup due to [POLLOUT] on fd 101 (10.232.2.2

[ovs-discuss] ovsdb relay server maybe memleak

2021-08-04 Thread 贾文涛
ovn scale test, 3 clustered sb, 10 sb relay server, 1000 sandbox。 The maximum memory used by the sb relay server is over 26G [root@node-4 ~]# for i in `kubectl get pods -n openstack | grep ovsdb-sb-relay | awk '{print $1}'`; do kubectl exec -it -n openstack $i -- top -bn1| grep ovsdb; done 2 9

Re: [ovs-discuss] ovsdb relay server segment fault

2021-08-04 Thread Ilya Maximets
> ovn scale test, 3 clustered sb, 10 sb relay server, 1000 sandbox。 > sb relay sever will be segment fault accidentally > [root at node-4 ~]# kubectl logs -n openstack > ovn-ovsdb-sb-relay-79d5dd7ff4-tqbbd --tail 10 -p > 22021-08-01T03:09:44Z|15758|poll_loop|INFO|wakeup due to [POLLOUT] on fd 10

Re: [ovs-discuss] OVN /OVS openvswitch: ovs-system: deferred action limit reached, drop recirc action

2021-08-04 Thread Numan Siddique
On Wed, Aug 4, 2021 at 4:17 AM Krzysztof Klimonda wrote: > > Hi Ammad, > > (Re-adding ovs-discuss@openvswitch.org to CC to keep track of the discussion) > > Thanks for testing it with SNAT enabled/disabled and verifying that it seems > to be related. > > As for the impact of this bug I have to sa

Re: [ovs-discuss] ovsdb relay server maybe memleak

2021-08-04 Thread Ilya Maximets
> ovn scale test, 3 clustered sb, 10 sb relay server, 1000 sandbox。 > The maximum memory used by the sb relay server is over 26G > > > [root at node-4 ~]# for i in `kubectl get pods -n openstack | grep > ovsdb-sb-relay | awk '{print $1}'`; do kubectl exec -it -n openstack $i -- > top -bn1| grep

Re: [ovs-discuss] OVN /OVS openvswitch: ovs-system: deferred action limit reached, drop recirc action

2021-08-04 Thread Han Zhou
On Wed, Aug 4, 2021 at 6:41 AM Numan Siddique wrote: > > On Wed, Aug 4, 2021 at 4:17 AM Krzysztof Klimonda > wrote: > > > > Hi Ammad, > > > > (Re-adding ovs-discuss@openvswitch.org to CC to keep track of the discussion) > > > > Thanks for testing it with SNAT enabled/disabled and verifying that i