Hi,
I'm deploying OVN with OVS-DPDK. When I'm trying to offload flows by using
rte_flow, I find the following logs appear every second. How to get rid
those offload incompatible flows warning/error logs? How can I safely
select which offload incompatible flow should not be offloaded?
2023-02-06T1
Hello,
On Mon, Feb 6, 2023 at 4:16 PM Lazuardi Nasution via discuss
wrote:
>
> Hi,
>
> I'm deploying OVN with OVS-DPDK. When I'm trying to offload flows by using
> rte_flow, I find the following logs appear every second. How to get rid those
> offload incompatible flows warning/error logs? How
HI David,
Don't you think that offload of reserved Ethernet address should be
disabled by default?
Best regards.
On Mon, Feb 6, 2023 at 10:36 PM David Marchand
wrote:
> Hello,
>
> On Mon, Feb 6, 2023 at 4:16 PM Lazuardi Nasution via discuss
> wrote:
> >
> > Hi,
> >
> > I'm deploying OVN with
On Mon, Feb 6, 2023 at 7:36 AM David Marchand wrote:
>
> Hello,
>
> On Mon, Feb 6, 2023 at 4:16 PM Lazuardi Nasution via discuss
> wrote:
> >
> > Hi,
> >
> > I'm deploying OVN with OVS-DPDK. When I'm trying to offload flows by using
> > rte_flow, I find the following logs appear every second. Ho
Hi Ajit,
If you think that it should not be offloaded, please suggest the OVS
development team for excluding reserved Ethernet addresses from offloading.
As far as I know, LLDP Ethernet addresses and other reserved Ethernet
addresses should be processed by software (control plane).
Best regards.
On Mon, Feb 6, 2023 at 5:46 PM Lazuardi Nasution wrote:
>
> HI David,
>
> Don't you think that offload of reserved Ethernet address should be disabled
> by default?
What OVN requests in this trace (dropping) makes sense to me if those
lacp frames are to be ignored at the CP level.
I don't see wh
Hi David,
I think I can understand your opinion. So your target is to prevent frames
with those ethernet addresses from reaching CP, right? FYI, I'm using
bonded VFs of bonded PFs as OVS-DPDK interfaces, so offcourse LACP should
be handled by bonded PFs only.
Best regards,
On Mon, Feb 6, 2023 at
On Mon, Feb 6, 2023 at 9:02 AM Lazuardi Nasution wrote:
>
> Hi David,
>
> I think I can understand your opinion. So your target is to prevent frames
> with those ethernet addresses from reaching CP, right? FYI, I'm using bonded
> VFs of bonded PFs as OVS-DPDK interfaces, so offcourse LACP should
Hi Ajit,
I'm using the following versions.
dpdk_version: "DPDK 21.11.2"
ovs_version : "3.0.1"
Best regards.
On Tue, Feb 7, 2023 at 12:12 AM Ajit Khaparde
wrote:
> On Mon, Feb 6, 2023 at 9:02 AM Lazuardi Nasution
> wrote:
> >
> > Hi David,
> >
> > I think I can understand your
Hi there
I have a simple group with two buckets:
group_id=3,type=select,selection_method=dp_hash,selection_method_param=1,bucket=bucket_id:1,actions=load:0x1->OXM_OF_PKT_REG0[],output:4,bucket=bucket_id:2,actions=load:0x2->OXM_OF_PKT_REG0[],output:7
I have a healthy mix of UDP with different src
10 matches
Mail list logo