otiation is required.
>>
>> My opinion is that OVS appears to be behaving correctly to restart LACP
>> negotiation on both links upon receiving the all-zero actor TLV from
>> peer switch. The issue is likely on the peer switch, it probably should
>> have sent a prop
Given that the partner port_id on the rogue packet matches the slave
it's sent out. I lean towards #1, that the LACP implementation is
somehow mixing up the status for the slave's pdu, rather than leaking
eth1's pdu out the eth0 interface.
-Chad
___
