On Mon, Jul 1, 2024 at 10:11 AM junwan...@cestc.cn wrote:
> >I don't think we need to carry this padding over a tunnel.
> >I did not test but I wonder if adjusting ip_tot_size is better.
> >
> >Something like:
> >
> >@@ -158,7 +158,8 @@ netdev_tnl_push_ip_header(struct dp_packet
> >*packet, const
On Mon, Jul 1, 2024 at 6:25 AM junwang01--- via discuss
wrote:
>
> Hi,team.
> Some switches add padding bytes to packets smaller than 64 bytes that are
> sent from outside.
> However, in our netdev_tnl_push_ip_header processing, we directly set
> l2_pad_size to 0.
> I believe that l2_pad_siz
On Mon, Feb 6, 2023 at 5:46 PM Lazuardi Nasution wrote:
>
> HI David,
>
> Don't you think that offload of reserved Ethernet address should be disabled
> by default?
What OVN requests in this trace (dropping) makes sense to me if those
lacp frames are to be ignored at the CP level.
I don't see wh
Hello,
On Mon, Feb 6, 2023 at 4:16 PM Lazuardi Nasution via discuss
wrote:
>
> Hi,
>
> I'm deploying OVN with OVS-DPDK. When I'm trying to offload flows by using
> rte_flow, I find the following logs appear every second. How to get rid those
> offload incompatible flows warning/error logs? How
