Hi all,
After debugging and trying to understand when this behavior was introduced,
we figured out the ofensor commit was this one [0]. We backported only this
commit to the OVS 2.17.2 and the issue was reproduced.
@Ilya Maximets do you have any idea how this patch could interfere with
ICMP v6
Hi all,
I was checking the datapath flows before and after the upgrade and the
below second flow from each output (before/after the upgrade) has a
difference about the ct_mark:
##before the upgrade
#
Hi all,
Enabling the debugging, we can see the following:
2024-04-26T20:54:25.880Z|4|dpif(handler75)|DBG|system@ovs-system: miss
upcall:
Hi all,
While testing the upgrade path from OVN 22.03.1/OVS 2.17.2 to OVN
23.03.1/OVS 3.1.3 on Ubuntu 22.04/kernel 5.15 and 6.5 we are seeing a
strange behavior for icmpv6 traffic.
Before the upgrade a simple north-south or west-east ping between IPv6
hosts would have a low jitter like below:
64
When using OVN-IC in a scenario with 2 AZ's for a tenant, there is one
Logical router by AZ and multiple transit switches. The Logical
routers has multiple DGPs and each one is connected to one transit
switch as below:
transit-switch1
/
ge in ovn-northd logfile.
> >>
> >>logical_port: optional string
> >> The name of the logical port where the logical_ip resides.
> >>
> >> This is only used on distributed routers. This must be
> specified in orde
or a NAT rule on a distrib‐
> uted router, then this NAT rule will be processed in a
> centralized manner on the gateway port
> instance on the gateway chassis.
>
> On 15 Mar 2023, at 19:22, Tiago Pires via discuss <
> ovs-discuss@openvswitch.org> wrote:
&g
Hi,
In an OVN Interconnection environment (OVN 22.03) with a few AZs, I noticed
that when the OVN router has a SNAT enabled or DNAT_AND_SNAT,
the traffic between the AZs is nated.
When checking the OVN router's logical flows, it is possible to see the LSP
that is connected into the transit switch
Hey,
Question, when using OVN-IC would it be possible to use OVN Central in
different versions? In other words, is it backward compatible?
Regards,
Tiago Pires
--
_‘Esta mensagem é direcionada apenas para os endereços constantes no
cabeçalho inicial. Se você não está listado nos
