On Tue, Jun 02, 2020 at 04:52:36PM +0530, K Chandra wrote:
> Hi Simon,
>
> Thanks for the feedback.
>
> Please find my comments inline.
>
> Best Regards
> Chandra
> On Tue, Jun 2, 2020 at 2:20 PM Simon Horman
> wrote:
>
> > On Fri, May 29, 2020 at 01:45:16PM -0700, Ben Pfaff wrote:
> > > This
Hi Simon,
Thanks for the feedback.
Please find my comments inline.
Best Regards
Chandra
On Tue, Jun 2, 2020 at 2:20 PM Simon Horman
wrote:
> On Fri, May 29, 2020 at 01:45:16PM -0700, Ben Pfaff wrote:
> > This seems like something for Simon to look at.
> >
> > On Fri, May 29, 2020 at
On Fri, May 29, 2020 at 01:45:16PM -0700, Ben Pfaff wrote:
> This seems like something for Simon to look at.
>
> On Fri, May 29, 2020 at 04:56:11PM +0530, K Chandra wrote:
> > OVS-TC offload sends only fields that are not completely masked out to the
> > TC kernel module. Some of the hardware we
This seems like something for Simon to look at.
On Fri, May 29, 2020 at 04:56:11PM +0530, K Chandra wrote:
> OVS-TC offload sends only fields that are not completely masked out to the
> TC kernel module. Some of the hardware we work with requires all fields
> extracted from the packet along with
OVS-TC offload sends only fields that are not completely masked out to the
TC kernel module. Some of the hardware we work with requires all fields
extracted from the packet along with the mask to be sent to the driver.
Hardware may optimise tables based on entire fields of packet and mask of
