On 4/10/2020 9:09 AM, Lazuardi Nasution wrote:
Hi Greg, Tonghao,
In case I use option No.2, how to make encapsulated traffic inside a VLAN?
Should I do following steps?
* Create representor ports of VFs
* Make bonding of created VFs (the VF are from member bonded PFs)
* Create VLAN of bonded
Hi Greg, Tonghao,
In case I use option No.2, how to make encapsulated traffic inside a VLAN?
Should I do following steps?
* Create representor ports of VFs
* Make bonding of created VFs (the VF are from member bonded PFs)
* Create VLAN of bonded VFs
* Give IP for created VLAN
* Use created IP for
On Thu, Apr 9, 2020 at 12:07 PM Lazuardi Nasution
wrote:
>
> Hi Greg,
>
> Any concern I should know if I choose to use option No. 1? Something like
> what Tonghao tell on previous e-mail on this thread?
maybe different solution, about isolated mode, please see:
https://doc.dpdk.org/guides/prog_g
Hi Greg,
Any concern I should know if I choose to use option No. 1? Something like
what Tonghao tell on previous e-mail on this thread?
Best regards,
On Thu, Apr 9, 2020, 02:24 Gregory Rose wrote:
>
> On 4/8/2020 8:32 AM, Lazuardi Nasution wrote:
> > Hi Greg,
> >
> > Thank you for your suggest
On 4/8/2020 8:32 AM, Lazuardi Nasution wrote:
Hi Greg,
Thank you for your suggestion. But anyway, why don't you suggest No. 1?
In term of using suggested No. 2 with MLX5 PMD, is representor port still
needed? I assume that there is no need to communicate between PF and VF.
Let's say, PF is us
Hi Tonghao,
Thank you for your suggestion. So you mean the best option is still on No.
2? There is unanswered question about the representor port. What do you
think? Is it necessary?
Best regards,
On Wed, Apr 8, 2020, 23:21 Tonghao Zhang wrote:
> On Wed, Apr 8, 2020 at 11:32 PM Lazuardi Nasuti
On Wed, Apr 8, 2020 at 11:32 PM Lazuardi Nasution
wrote:
>
> Hi Greg,
>
> Thank you for your suggestion. But anyway, why don't you suggest No. 1?
>
> In term of using suggested No. 2 with MLX5 PMD, is representor port still
> needed? I assume that there is no need to communicate between PF and VF
Hi Greg,
Thank you for your suggestion. But anyway, why don't you suggest No. 1?
In term of using suggested No. 2 with MLX5 PMD, is representor port still
needed? I assume that there is no need to communicate between PF and VF.
Let's say, PF is used for Ceph storage and other kernel based (non-DP
On 4/8/2020 5:50 AM, Lazuardi Nasution wrote:
Hi,
I'm looking for best practice or experience on running OVS-DPDK and other
kernel based applications with the same interface especially with MLX5 PMD.
As long as I know, one of both must use VF and the other use PF
since kernel and DPDK cannot b
Hi,
I'm looking for best practice or experience on running OVS-DPDK and other
kernel based applications with the same interface especially with MLX5 PMD.
As long as I know, one of both must use VF and the other use PF
since kernel and DPDK cannot bind to same interface. Which one of following
is p
10 matches
Mail list logo
