Re: [ovs-discuss] DNAT missing from datapath actions in ofproto/trace

2019-05-09 Thread Ben Pfaff
On Wed, May 08, 2019 at 02:54:58PM -0600, Carl Baldwin wrote: > Thanks for your quick response. Your assessment makes sense to me. For > IPv4, I don't think 0 would be a valid protocol number but for IPv6 it > would mean that the hop-by-hop options are present. For IPv6, OVS does not literally

Re: [ovs-discuss] DNAT missing from datapath actions in ofproto/trace

2019-05-08 Thread Carl Baldwin
Ben, Thanks for your quick response. Your assessment makes sense to me. For IPv4, I don't think 0 would be a valid protocol number but for IPv6 it would mean that the hop-by-hop options are present. What do you think about the extra no-op actions in the datapath actions when I set the protocol

Re: [ovs-discuss] DNAT missing from datapath actions in ofproto/trace

2019-05-07 Thread Ben Pfaff
I investigated this a little bit by putting the following in a file named 'flows': table=0 ip,in_port=4,dl_dst=a6:c1:a7:15:a4:3d,nw_dst=10.39.176.4,priority=3100, actions=resubmit(,25) table=25, ip,vlan_tci=0x1000/0x1000,nw_dst=10.39.176.4, priority=3100,

[ovs-discuss] DNAT missing from datapath actions in ofproto/trace

2019-05-07 Thread Carl Baldwin
Greetings, I have been using ofproto/trace to verify the actions taken on various packets through an OVS bridge. My methodology is basically to specify the action in br_flow format to ovs-appctl ofproto/trace and then comparing the datapath actions line with expected actions. I ran into an