Re: [ovs-discuss] How to implement nat elegantly on 2.5.x

2020-03-19 Thread Ben Pfaff
On Sat, Mar 14, 2020 at 11:57:09AM +0800, a* wrote: > The most recent release from the LTS series: 2.5.9, but it does not support > ct action. > Which version do I need to upgrade to and that version is stable and will be > maintained in the future? OVS does not have a newer LTS release. If

Re: [ovs-discuss] How to implement nat elegantly on 2.5.x

2020-03-13 Thread a*****
Hi Ben, The most recent release from the LTS series: 2.5.9, but it does not support ct action. Which version do I need to upgrade to and that version is stable and will be maintained in the future? Thanks, Albert At 2020-03-13 23:51:05, "Ben Pfaff" wrote: >On Fri, Mar 13, 2020 at 03:4

Re: [ovs-discuss] How to implement nat elegantly on 2.5.x

2020-03-13 Thread Ben Pfaff
On Fri, Mar 13, 2020 at 03:48:50PM +0800, a* wrote: > Is there any good way to implement nat in ovs 2.5.x? > I thought of the following two options, but I don't think it is the most > ideal solution. > 1. iptables + ovs bridge ( Performance loss ) > 2. All the flows that were normally forwarde

[ovs-discuss] How to implement nat elegantly on 2.5.x

2020-03-13 Thread a*****
Hi all, Is there any good way to implement nat in ovs 2.5.x? I thought of the following two options, but I don't think it is the most ideal solution. 1. iptables + ovs bridge ( Performance loss ) 2. All the flows that were normally forwarded are resubmitted to another table A, and address trans