On 6/15/21 4:31 AM, Tony van der Peet wrote:
> I did the patch as suggested, and it looks something like this:
>
> --- a/lib/dpif-netdev.c
> +++ b/lib/dpif-netdev.c
> @@ -4168,9 +4168,13 @@dpif_netdev_execute(struct dpif *dpif, struct
> dpif_execute *execute)
> flow
I did the patch as suggested, and it looks something like this:
--- a/lib/dpif-netdev.c
+++ b/lib/dpif-netdev.c
@@ -4168,9 +4168,13 @@ dpif_netdev_execute(struct dpif *dpif, struct
dpif_execute *execute)
flow_hash_5tuple(execute->flow, 0));
}
+/* We are not
Yes, I can create that patch.
Tony
On Sat, Jun 12, 2021 at 5:24 AM Ilya Maximets wrote:
> On 6/9/21 3:12 PM, Aaron Conole wrote:
> > Ilya Maximets writes:
> >
> >> On 6/7/21 3:59 PM, Ilya Maximets wrote:
> >>> On 6/7/21 3:09 PM, Aaron Conole wrote:
> Ilya Maximets writes:
>
> >>
On 6/9/21 3:12 PM, Aaron Conole wrote:
> Ilya Maximets writes:
>
>> On 6/7/21 3:59 PM, Ilya Maximets wrote:
>>> On 6/7/21 3:09 PM, Aaron Conole wrote:
Ilya Maximets writes:
>> Here is a patch with both a test and a fix.
Thanks so much! It's nice to get fixes, but I think
Ilya Maximets writes:
> On 6/7/21 3:59 PM, Ilya Maximets wrote:
>> On 6/7/21 3:09 PM, Aaron Conole wrote:
>>> Ilya Maximets writes:
>>>
> Here is a patch with both a test and a fix.
>>>
>>> Thanks so much! It's nice to get fixes, but I think it's really great
>>> when test cases come along
On 6/7/21 3:59 PM, Ilya Maximets wrote:
> On 6/7/21 3:09 PM, Aaron Conole wrote:
>> Ilya Maximets writes:
>>
Here is a patch with both a test and a fix.
>>
>> Thanks so much! It's nice to get fixes, but I think it's really great
>> when test cases come along with them.
>>
>>> Hi. Thanks for
On 6/7/21 3:09 PM, Aaron Conole wrote:
> Ilya Maximets writes:
>
>>> Here is a patch with both a test and a fix.
>
> Thanks so much! It's nice to get fixes, but I think it's really great
> when test cases come along with them.
>
>> Hi. Thanks for working n this!
>>
>> CC: ovs-dev
>>
>>> Not s
Ilya Maximets writes:
>> Here is a patch with both a test and a fix.
Thanks so much! It's nice to get fixes, but I think it's really great
when test cases come along with them.
> Hi. Thanks for working n this!
>
> CC: ovs-dev
>
>> Not submitting as a formal
>> patch because I would like some
> Here is a patch with both a test and a fix.
Hi. Thanks for working n this!
CC: ovs-dev
> Not submitting as a formal
> patch because I would like some feedback on whether 1) maintainers feel
> this is worth fixing and
I can reproduce the crash with your test. Basically, actions in userspace
Here is a patch with both a test and a fix. Not submitting as a formal
patch because I would like some feedback on whether 1) maintainers feel
this is worth fixing and 2) whether this is the way to fix it.
I have tried to make the most minimal change possible, but this means that
there might be pa
10 matches
Mail list logo
