Thanks. Is there any forum where i can discuss the design for same?
Regards,
Bindiya
On Thu, Aug 29, 2019 at 1:22 AM Justin Pettit wrote:
> I understand. This has been discussed previously on the mailing list.
> You are welcome to submit a patch upstream to provide that capability, but
> I sus
I understand. This has been discussed previously on the mailing list. You are
welcome to submit a patch upstream to provide that capability, but I suspect
you will get some resistance--especially from the Linux kernel community.
--Justin
> On Aug 27, 2019, at 11:25 PM, bindiya Kurle wrote:
Hi Justin,
Thanks for the clarification. I agree to your point ,but consider a
use-case if I have routing decision only based on destination ip then as
per current implementation, ovs will add 2 flows (in data path)for packets
coming from different source and if the TTL happens to be different for
I think it was considered cleaner from an ABI perspective, since it doesn't
require another action, since "set" was already supported. In practice, I
don't think it's a problem, since usually a TTL decrement is associated with a
routing decision, and TTLs tend to be fairly static between two ho
hi ,
I have a question related to dec_ttl action implemented in datapath.
when dec_ttl action is configured in OVS following action get added in
datapath.
recirc_id(0),in_port(2),eth(),eth_type(0x0800),ipv4(ttl=64,frag=no),
packets:3, bytes:294, used:0.068s, actions:set(ipv4(ttl=63)),3,
if packe