Hi,
We've hit a scaling issue recently [1] in the following topology:
- External network connected to public logical switch "LS-pub"
- ~300 logical networks (LR-i <--> LS-i <--> VMi) connected to LS-pub
with dnat_and_snat rules.
While trying to ping the VMs from outside the ARP request packet fr
On Tue, Oct 1, 2019 at 3:34 AM Dumitru Ceara wrote:
>
> Hi,
>
> We've hit a scaling issue recently [1] in the following topology:
>
> - External network connected to public logical switch "LS-pub"
> - ~300 logical networks (LR-i <--> LS-i <--> VMi) connected to LS-pub
> with dnat_and_snat rules.
>
On Tue, Oct 1, 2019 at 8:41 PM Han Zhou wrote:
>
>
>
> On Tue, Oct 1, 2019 at 3:34 AM Dumitru Ceara wrote:
> >
> > Hi,
> >
> > We've hit a scaling issue recently [1] in the following topology:
> >
> > - External network connected to public logical switch "LS-pub"
> > - ~300 logical networks (LR-i
On Wed, Oct 2, 2019 at 9:11 AM Dumitru Ceara wrote:
>
> On Tue, Oct 1, 2019 at 8:41 PM Han Zhou wrote:
> >
> >
> >
> > On Tue, Oct 1, 2019 at 3:34 AM Dumitru Ceara wrote:
> > >
> > > Hi,
> > >
> > > We've hit a scaling issue recently [1] in the following topology:
> > >
> > > - External network
On Wed, Oct 2, 2019 at 8:46 PM Han Zhou wrote:
>
>
>
> On Wed, Oct 2, 2019 at 9:11 AM Dumitru Ceara wrote:
> >
> > On Tue, Oct 1, 2019 at 8:41 PM Han Zhou wrote:
> > >
> > >
> > >
> > > On Tue, Oct 1, 2019 at 3:34 AM Dumitru Ceara wrote:
> > > >
> > > > Hi,
> > > >
> > > > We've hit a scaling i
On Wed, Oct 02, 2019 at 06:10:54PM +0200, Dumitru Ceara wrote:
> I'm afraid that increasing the limit will just postpone the problem
> for later. Also I'm worried about the time the packet would spend in
> the pipeline and the fact that potentially there will be high jitter
> between delivery times
