h.org>;
> Ben Pfaff<mailto:b...@ovn.org>
> CC: ovs-discuss@openvswitch.org<mailto:ovs-discuss@openvswitch.org>
> Subject: RE: [ovs-discuss] ovs support setting oom_score_adj for oom killer
> protection
> This might be a good idea in some scenarios and I have come across t
cuss@openvswitch.org<mailto:ovs-discuss@openvswitch.org>
Subject: RE: [ovs-discuss] ovs support setting oom_score_adj for oom killer
protection
This might be a good idea in some scenarios and I have come across this
earlier. We have done this in eNB to immunize the key daemon from oom killer by
...@openvswitch.org] On Behalf Of Zhangguanghui
Sent: Saturday, November 26, 2016 2:39 AM
To: ovs-discuss-boun...@openvswitch.org; Ben Pfaff
Cc: ovs-discuss@openvswitch.org
Subject: [ovs-discuss] ovs support setting oom_score_adj for oom killer
protection
Hi
It is well known that it is the job of the
Do other important daemons do this?
On Sat, Nov 26, 2016 at 02:39:02AM +, Zhangguanghui wrote:
> Hi
> It is well known that it is the job of the linux 'oom killer' to sacrifice
> one or more processes in order to free up memory for the system,
> It's essential that the important process ovs-
Hi
It is well known that it is the job of the linux 'oom killer' to sacrifice one
or more processes in order to free up memory for the system,
It's essential that the important process ovs-vswitchd is protected. for oom
killer protection,
I think that it's a good idea to modify oom_score_adj val
