Changing a pin seems much slower. I'll post the data tomorrow. I think that is
intrinsic to the chip.
PIO.ALL should be no slower than PIO.A, actually faster since it is the atomic
operation and changing just one pin involves reading that state of all, then
changing the requested bit and writing t
Am Mittwoch, 15. Juni 2005 04:57 schrieb Paul Alfille:
> I've written up my testing of OWFS performance.
>
Great. Many thanks for the data, Paul.
If I understand correctly, it cost about 20ms to check if a device is present
on the bus (list process). Does it have the same cost to read or change a
If you look in /proc/mtd, you see that the flash-erase-size is
detected to 0x1 = 64kb for the mtd4 area.
ewrt ~# df
Filesystem 1k-blocks Used Available Use% Mounted on
/dev/root 2816 2816 0 100% /
/dev/mtdblock/4320 132 188
