Re: [Owfs-developers] owfs-2.6p0 SLUG build?

2007-01-25 Thread Christian Magnusson
Hi, I haven't built any new slug-version since the cvs-version contained bugs that made it impossible for me to use. When Paul have fixed the simultaneous bug which showed up after the persistent-feature, I will make a new build. (I just wanted to keep a stable build in the repository) /Christia

Re: [Owfs-developers] owphp owfs-2.6p0 DS2408

2007-01-25 Thread Peter Kropf
On 1/25/07, Paul Alfille <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote: > Peter, have you looked persistent tcp connections? The strategy is to set > the persistent bit in the SG parameter of the message, and if it is returned > set, keep the same file descriptor open for the next message. If the next > message fails,

[Owfs-developers] owfs-2.6p0 SLUG build?

2007-01-25 Thread ziggy
I'd exercise the persistent TCP option, but I need a new build for the NSLU2. Real Life(tm) has not allowed for any owfs time in the last two weeks or so, sorry about the lack of updates. I've got ownet python module templates for the new read directory function and the persistent TCP connectio

Re: [Owfs-developers] owphp owfs-2.6p0 DS2408

2007-01-25 Thread Paul Alfille
Found the problem -- it was in swig.i uu unsed by owperl, pwpython and owphp. Fixed in the CVS. I'm working on some "simultaneous" bugs that Chrstian found, then we'll make a new release. Peter, have you looked persistent tcp connections? The strategy is to set the persistent bit in the SG param

Re: [Owfs-developers] owphp owfs-2.6p0 DS2408

2007-01-25 Thread Peter Kropf
Is he running owpython or owphp? Email seems to indicate owphp but I'm not entirely clear. - Peter On 1/25/07, Paul Alfille <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote: > I'm guessing it's the python interface, since owread and owhttpd seem happy. > > Perhaps we are reading the entire buffer, rather than "size" b

Re: [Owfs-developers] owphp owfs-2.6p0 DS2408

2007-01-25 Thread Paul Alfille
I'm guessing it's the python interface, since owread and owhttpd seem happy. Perhaps we are reading the entire buffer, rather than "size" bytes. Paul Alfille On 1/24/07, Paul Alfille < [EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote: Clearly sounds broken. Now to figure where. On 1/23/07, pappapop <[EMAIL PROTECTE

Re: [Owfs-developers] owserver segmentation fault / no debug

2007-01-25 Thread Paul Alfille
The second problem "owserver" alone causing a segfault I've seen and will upload a fix today. I'll look at error_print=3 but is isn't needed if you do --foreground, the error output will go to the console automatically. Paul Alfille On 1/25/07, George M. Zouganelis <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:

Re: [Owfs-developers] owserver segmentation fault / no debug

2007-01-25 Thread George M. Zouganelis
Paul, I was trying on cvs head: I have no debug output on # owserver --foreground --error_print 3 --error_level 9 -p 4304 -d /dev/ttyS0 shouldnt --error_print 3 show on stderr ? additionaly, executing just as below (i know they have no sense), i get a segmentation fault. # owserver # owserv