I know there are more modern methods than CVS, but I'm not sure what the
real benefit to our development model will be. There are only a few
contributors, few collisions, and only a single tree.
More to the point, changing from CVS would require changing documentation,
setting up the new system, a
or git?
njh
On Thu, 12 Mar 2009, Gregg C Levine wrote:
Hello!
Paul, how difficult is it to setup an SVN storage arrangement?
The point being, what happens if we need to setup a whole new revision
control service storage setup? For me I can either pull something from SVN
far easier then from CV
Hello!
Paul, how difficult is it to setup an SVN storage arrangement?
The point being, what happens if we need to setup a whole new revision
control service storage setup? For me I can either pull something from SVN
far easier then from CVS.
And I've suffered a disk crash, it's painful but expecte
Apparently Sourceforge's cvs RAID disk crashed. It's being rebuilt.
http://apps.sourceforge.net/wordpress/sourceforge/2009/03/11/2009-03-10-service-cvs-unplanned-downtime-update/
I hope it's fixable.
Paul Alfille
On Thu, Mar 12, 2009 at 7:06 PM, Gregg C Levine <
hansolofal...@worldnet.att.net>
Hello!
I just updated my Slackware Linux system to its 12.1 release (Which has
probably been superseded by the 12.2 one.) and it contains the release
for CVS of 1.11.22 and the usual methods for access a previously downloaded
code blob from CVS does not work.
It complains that anonymous logins
