I'm not sure the mouse is at fault, could be linux, but new mouses don't
exhibit the symptons, just used ones and just some of them
occasionally. I know Firefox has at least 3 interpretations of a right
mouse click and I can't figure out why, there's no consistency with the
errors except they
On 05-07-09 14:03, Paul Alfille wrote:
> Nice graph. You are monitoring car engine parameters?
mini tractor-puller with car engine http://www.minimumrisk.nl/?lng=en
> There is one other design alternative (which is sort of suggested by your
> note).
>
> Currently each cache item starts its time
Hello!
Paul you've got my approval.
I can see what direction the problem that Steinar Midtskogen is relating to
us, is coming from. And it isnt pretty.
This happens when what you're doing is under heavy load, correct? What Paul
proposes should clear it up completely.
--
Gregg C Levine hansolofal..
Paul Alfille writes:
> On Sun, Jul 5, 2009 at 1:23 AM, Steinar Midtskogen
> wrote:
>>
>> When the property is asked for with the full path of the location, a
>> successful read will confirm its location, so an explicit directory
>> scan adds nothing in that case, does it? So in that case it sho
On Sun, Jul 5, 2009 at 1:23 AM, Steinar Midtskogen wrote:
> [Paul Alfille]
>
>> In 2.5 we assumed "uncached" referred only to the property value, not
>> the location.
>> In 2.6 and later, "uncached" refers to both location and property
>> value. This forces clearance of stale directories.
>>
>> I s
On Thu, Jul 2, 2009 at 12:46 AM, Jaap Struyk wrote:
> On 01-07-09 03:48, Paul Alfille wrote:
>
>> There are 2 issues here:
>> 1. There is no automatic reread of data once a cached item times out.
>> A timeout_volatile of 1 second would make the maximum lifespan of a
>> data element be 1 second (but
Hi,
Jaap Struyk:
> For the logging data viewing afterwards an interval of 1 second is
> enough but I am planning on putting a small tft display on the tractor
> to replace my analog meters so I will see how fast I can go with polling
> before I run into trouble (hopefully 0.1 sec.)
That should
