Am 06.03.2018 um 07:23 schrieb Johan Ström:
> And no opinion against here either.. SF seems to have shaped up last day
> or two, but who know how long that will keep..
>
> What are your suggestions?
>
> Move GIT only, and keep site + mailinglist on sourceforge?
> Releases on Github I guess?
> (ht
And no opinion against here either.. SF seems to have shaped up last day
or two, but who know how long that will keep..
What are your suggestions?
Move GIT only, and keep site + mailinglist on sourceforge?
Releases on Github I guess?
(https://help.github.com/articles/creating-releases/)
Anyway,
On 18-03-05 13:11:23, Matthias Urlichs via Owfs-developers wrote:
On 05.03.2018 11:15, Stefano Miccoli wrote:
In my opinion it should be time to migrate the principal OWFS repo from SF to
GH.
Seconded. SF is not going to get better, long-term.
-- -- Matthias Urlichs
Thirded. I noticed that
On 05.03.2018 11:15, Stefano Miccoli wrote:
> In my opinion it should be time to migrate the principal OWFS repo from SF to
> GH.
Seconded. SF is not going to get better, long-term.
--
-- Matthias Urlichs
--
Check out
In my opinion it should be time to migrate the principal OWFS repo from SF to
GH.
Stefano
> On 5 Mar 2018, at 07:26, Johan Ström wrote:
>
> On 02/03/18 01:48, Gregg Levine wrote:
>> Hello!
>> I have the most recent numbered release on a Pi3 (now on a Pi Zero W)
>> running and working. However
> Fortunately, a while back I setup a mirror on Github,
> https://github.com/owfs/owfs, which is (or at least attempts to be)
> synced every 15 minutes.
> This can be used for read access when sourceforge is unreachable.
>
> Also, so far we've actually had 2 pull requests coming in through GH!
I w
